不同回收组套回收超长期时间窗OptEase下腔静脉滤器效果

Different retrieval kits for ultra-long time window OptEase inferior vena cava filter

目的观察Cook回收组套回收超长期时间窗OptEase下腔静脉滤器的效果。方法回顾性分析289例接受OptEase可回收下腔静脉滤器取出术患者,242例于正常时间窗(置入滤器14天内)回收滤器,其中127例(A组)使用OptEase回收组套、115例(B组)使用Cook回收组套;47例于超长期时间窗(滤器置入>28天)回收,其中22例使用OptEase回收组套(C组)、25例使用Cook回收组套(D组)。比较A组与B组、C组与D组滤器回收成功率、回收时间及并发症发生率。结果A、B组均成功回收滤器,2组间滤器回收时间、并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。D组滤器回收成功率高于C组(P<0.05),回收时间及并发症发生率均低于C组(P均<0.05)。各组均未见严重并发症。结论Cook滤器回收组套用于回收超长期时间窗OptEase下腔静脉滤器效果较好。

Objective To observe the effect of Cook retrieval group set to retrieve super long time window OptEase inferior vena cava(IVC)filter.Methods Clinical data of 289 patients who underwent retrieval OptEase recoverable IVC filter were retrospectively analyzed.IVC filters were retrieved in normal time window(the time of filter placement≤14 days)in 242 cases,including 127 using OptEase retrieval sets(group A)and 115 using Cook retrieval sets(group B).Meanwhile,IVC filters of 47 cases were retrieved in the ultra-long time window(the time of filter placement>28 days),including 22 using OptEase retrieval sets(group C)and 25 using Cook retrieval sets(group D).The filter retrieval success rates,retrieval time and complication rates were compared between group A and B,group C and D.Results IVC filters were successfully retrieved in group A and B.There was no significant difference of retrieval time nor complication rate between group A and B(both P>0.05).The success rate of filter retrieval in group D was higher than that in group C(P<0.05),while the retrieval time and complication rate of group D were both lower than those in group C(both P<0.05).No serious complication occurred.Conclusion The retrieval effect of Cook filter retrieval set is good for ultra long-term time window OptEase venous filter.