期刊文献+

考虑决策者失望规避的供应链协同绿色创新动态优化与协调研究 被引量:16

Dynamic Optimization and Coordination on Joint Green Innovation in a Supply Chain ConsideringDisappointment Aversion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对决策者存在失望规避行为且产品绿色水平具有动态变化特征的情形,基于失望理论,运用微分博弈的方法研究了供应链协同绿色创新动态优化与协调问题,探讨了供应链成员失望规避程度对绿色创新决策及供应链绩效的影响,并提出双向成本分担契约对供应链进行协调。结果表明,供应链成员是否选择协同绿色创新及产品的绿色水平均与成员的失望规避程度密切相关;分散式决策下,若制造商选择分担供应商部分绿色创新成本,其分担比例与制造商失望规避程度负相关,与供应商失望规避程度正相关;集中式决策下,产品绿色水平、成员绿色创新水平及效用现值均高于协调前分散系统中的对应值;在一定条件下,双向成本分担契约的设计与实施,能有效提升供应链成员效用现值,实现供应链协调。 Green innovation has become an important method for enterprises to obtain advantage against the background of green development.Considering supply chain members who possess disappointment aversion and the green products which are characteristic of dynamic change,based on disappointment theory,a dynamic optimization and coordination model for joint green innovation is established.Using the feedback method,we obtain the optimal equilibrium strategies under different decision-making scenarios,and investigate the impacts of supply chain members’disappointment aversion on product’s green level as well as the supply chain’s performance.Furthermore,a two-way cost sharing contract is proposed to coordinate the supply chain.The results show that:whether the supply chainmembers conduct green innovation jointly as well as the green degree of product are particularly relevant for the level of supply chain members’disappointment aversion;under the decentralized scenario,the cost sharing proportion decreases with manufacturer’s disappointment aversion degree and increases with supplier’s disappointment aversion degree in the situation which manufacturer would like to share the green innovation costs of supplier;by comparison,the product’s green degree and supply chain’s performance under centralized setting have more advantage than that under decentralized setting;besides,under certain conditions,a two-way costs sharing contract adoption can realize supply chain coordination.
作者 关志民 曲优 赵莹 GUAN Zhi-min;QU You;ZHAO Ying(School of Business Administration,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China)
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第5期96-107,共12页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972100,71372186)。
关键词 绿色供应链 失望规避 微分博弈 成本分担契约 green supply chain disappointment aversion differential game cost sharing contract
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献63

  • 1陈云,王浣尘,沈惠璋.电子商务零售商与传统零售商的价格竞争研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(1):35-41. 被引量:133
  • 2Dinan T. Policy options for reducing C02 emissions[R]. Washington,D.C., The congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office,2008.http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/89xx/doc8934/02-12-Carbon.pdf.
  • 3中国经济导报.低碳产品认证:期待改变“节能不低碳”怪现象[EB/OL]. http://www.ceh.com.cn/ztbd/jnjpzk/146186.shtml, 2012-11-17/2013-3-31.
  • 4国家发展改革委,国家认监委.关于印发《低碳产品认证管理暂行办法》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/zcfb/zclbtz/2013tz/t20130319_533084.htm, 2013-2-18/2013-3-31.
  • 5Zhang J, Nie T, Du S. Optimal emission-dependent production policy with stochastic demand[J]. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 2011, 3(1-2): 21-39.
  • 6Hua G, Cheng T C E, Wang S. Managing carbon footprints in inventory management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics. 2011, 132(2): 178-185.
  • 7Song J, Leng M. Analysis of the single-period problem under carbon emissions policies[J]. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 2012, 176: 297-313.
  • 8Zhang B, Xu L. Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, Published on line, http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.024i.
  • 9Elhedhli S, Merrick R. Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions[J]. Transportation Research Part D, 2012, 17(5): 370-379.
  • 10Benjaafar S, Li Y, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models [J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2013,10(1): 99-116.

共引文献209

同被引文献165

引证文献16

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部