期刊文献+

连续性评估记录和评价(CARE)量表用于脑卒中患者评定的效度研究 被引量:1

The validity of the Continuity Assessment Record and Evaluation (CARE) scale for assessing stroke
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:连续性评估记录和评价(Continuity Assessment Record and Evaluation,CARE)量表是美国对患者急性期、亚急性期、慢性期进行标准化的连续性评价的综合量表,本文研究目的在于开发中文版的CARE量表,并在脑卒中患者中应用,进行该量表的效度研究。方法:确定中文版CARE量表的条目,选择30例脑卒中患者进行CARE及Barthel指数(Barthel index,BI)量表、改良Barthel指数(Modified Barthel index,MBI)量表、扩展Barthel指数(Extended Barthel Index,EBI)量表评估,将CARE与BI、MBI、EBI量表进行关联,进行Spearman相关分析以检验中文版CARE的效度。结果:中文版CARE量表与BI、MBI、EBI总分相关系数(r=0.848、0.864、0.917)呈高度相关,P<0.01。结论:中文版CARE量表具有良好的效度,是评估中国脑卒中人群功能质量标准的有用工具,可在临床推广应用。 Objective:The American developed continuity assessment record and evaluation(CARE)scale is a standardized,integrative scale for evaluation of functional status for acute,subacute and chronic stage patient care providing.The aim of this study is to examine the validity of Chinese Taipei developed Chinese version of the CARE scale for assessing the functional outcomes among stroke patients.Method:Thirty stroke patients were evaluated by Chinese version of CARE and BI,MBI,EBI.The spearman correlation analysis was performed to test the validity of the-Chinese version of CARE.Result:The Chinese version of the CARE scale was highly correlated with BI,MBI,EBI.The correlation coefficient of each item were 0.848,0.864,0.917(P<0.01),and the validity is good.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the CARE scale has good standard validity and is a useful tool for assessing the functional quality standards of Chinese stroke patients.It is worthy of clinical application.
作者 张学敏 毕胜 赵海红 孙爱萍 张嗣敏 霍剑菲 冯燕 吴慧楠 ZHANG Xuemin;BI Sheng;ZHAO Haihong(Department of Neurological Rehabilitation,National Rehabilitation Hospital of National Research Center for Rehabilitation Technical Aids,Beijing,100176)
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第9期1077-1081,共5页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
基金 民政部康复领域重点实验室运行维护费项目(0302-120603020063)。
关键词 连续性评估记录和评价量表 脑卒中 扩展Barthel指数 效度 continuity assessment record and evaluation stroke extended Barthel index validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献49

  • 1柳卫民,郑丽芳,梅元武.脑卒中患者生活质量的评估及其影响因素[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(29):142-144. 被引量:15
  • 2老膺荣,郭新峰,赖世隆,梁伟雄,温泽淮,王奇,黄培新,黄燕.不同维度多个量表对脑卒中恢复期评价的比较[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(29):4-7. 被引量:8
  • 3各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33055
  • 4Shah S,Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel IndeX for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol, 1989,42:703-709.
  • 5Eakin P, Baird H. The Community Dependency Index:a standardized assessment of need and measure of outcome for community occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther, 1995,58 : 17-22.
  • 6Hachisuka K, Ogata H, Ohkkuma H, et al. Test-retest and inter-method reliability of the self-rating Barthel Index. Clin Rehabil, 1997,11 : 28 -35.
  • 7Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke. The copenhagen strokes study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1997,78:161-165.
  • 8Kwon S,Hartzema AG,Duncan PW,et al. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the functional independence measure and the modified Rankin scale. Stroke, 2004, 35: 918-923.
  • 9Dennis W, Pamela W, Sue ML. Comparison of responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the functional measure in stroke,the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol,2002,55:922-928.
  • 10Gosman-Hedstrom G, Svensson E. Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disabil Rehabil, 2000,22:702-715.

共引文献1688

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部