摘要
目的:总结分析7例申请预防接种异常反应鉴定受种者的相关资料及鉴定过程,以期推动预防接种异常反应鉴定工作的顺利进行。方法:回顾性分析2010—2018年间广州市医学会完成的7例申请预防接种异常反应鉴定受种者的相关资料,并对鉴定结论和调查诊断结论不一致的原因进行分析。结果:7例鉴定结论中4例不属于预防接种异常反应,3例属于预防接种异常反应。鉴定结论和调查诊断结论相同者3例,占比42.86%(3/7),不同者4例,占比57.14%(4/7),存在明显差异。结论:加强学术交流与培训,修改《预防接种异常反应鉴定办法》有助于保障预防接种异常反应鉴定工作公平、公正开展。
Objective:To summarize and analyze the data and identification process of 7patients who applied for the identification of adverse events following immunization,so as to promote the identification of adverse events following immunization.Methods:The data of 7patients who applied for identification of adverse events following immunization from 2010to 2018in Guangzhou Medical Association were analyzed retrospectively.And the cause of the inconsistency between the identification conclusion and the investigation diagnosis conclusion was analyzed.Results:4of the 7identification conclusions did not belong to the adverse events following immunization,but 3cases were adverse events following immunization.The conclusion of identification was the same as that of investigation diagnosis in 3cases,accounting for 42.86%(3/7),but 4cases were different,accounting for 57.14%(4/7),there were significant differences.Conclusions:To strengthen academic exchange and training,and to revise the laws of identification of adverse events following immunization are helpful to guarantee the fair and impartial appraisal of adverse events following immunization.
作者
罗红彬
陈美倩
杨锡龙
Luo Hongbin;Chen Meiqian;Yang Xilong(Guangzhou Medical Association/Guangzhou Medical Accident Technical Appraisal Center,Guangzhou 510180,China)
出处
《中国卫生法制》
2020年第5期89-91,96,共4页
China Health Law
关键词
预防接种
异常反应
鉴定
调查诊断
疫苗
Immunization
Adverse events
Identification
Investigation and diagnosis
Vaccine