期刊文献+

MixSIAR和IsoSource模型解析植物水分来源的比较研究 被引量:12

Comparative study of MixSIAR and IsoSource models in the analysis of plant water sources
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选取西南喀斯特地区次生林中主要优势植物刺楸(Kalopanax septemlobus(Thunb.)Koidz.)、香椿(Toona sinensis)和化香(Platycarya strobilacea Sieb.et Zucc.)为研究对象,通过对不同土壤深度的土壤水、泉水、雨水和植物采样,利用氢氧稳定同位素技术,借助IsoSource和MixSIAR两种模型分析植物水分来源,通过直接相关法判断植物主要吸水源来衡量两种模型的适用性。结果表明,降雨δ^18O值在3月—6月偏正,在6月—8月数据偏负,存在明显的季节变化。在春季不同土壤层土壤水δ^18O值土壤深度增加而降低,夏季呈现相反的规律。基于IsoSource和MixSIAR模型计算植物不同水分来源比例时存在一定差异。基于直接相关法定性分析植物水分来源表明MixSIAR模型计算结果可靠性高于IsoSource模型。基于均方根误差(Root Mean Square Error,RMSE)进行模型评价,结果显示出MixSIAR模型的RMSE结果小于IsoSource模型,表明利用MixSIAR模型计算植物对各水源的利用比例适用性高于IsoSource模型。本文结果有助于在解析植物水分来源时为模型的选择提供参考。 Plant water source is a prerequisite for research and management of agriculture and ecology.Especially in Karst areas,due to the special geological conditions,plants are prone to generally suffer in severe water deficit.Understanding the plant water sources is therefore important for ecological restoration.In this study,the main dominant plants in the secondary forest of southwest karst regions,Kalopanax septemlobus(Thunb.)Koidz.,Toona sinensis and Platycarya strobilacea Sieb.et Zucc.were selected.Isotopic samples of soil moisture at different soil depth,spring water,rain water and plants were collected.We analyzed the plants water sources by IsoSource and MixSIAR models,and the performance of the two models were compared.The results showed that the δ^18O values of rainfall were positive during March to June,while these values were negative during June to September,2017.Thus,the δ^18O of rainfall exhibited the significantly temporal or seasonal variations.Theδ18O values of soil moisture at different soil layers decreased with the increase of soil depth in spring,while this circumstance was contrary in summer.There were significant differences in calculating the proportion of plants water sources between IsoSource and MixSIAR models.The analysis of plant water sources based on the direct inference approach showed that the performance of MixSIAR model was better than that of IsoSource model.The performance of MixSIAR model(Root Mean Square Error(RMSE),0.61 in spring and 0.59 in summer)outperformed the IsoSource model(RMSE,0.84 in spring and 0.74 in summer)in estimating the plants water sources.The results of the study can provide a beneficial guide in model decision for the future researchers in plant water sources.
作者 曾祥明 徐宪立 钟飞霞 易汝舟 徐超昊 张耀华 ZENG Xiangming;XU Xianli;ZHONG Feixia;YI Ruzhou;XU Chaohao;ZHANG Yaohua(Institute of Subtropical Agriculture,Chinese Academy of Science,Changsha 410125,China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;Huanjiang Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystem,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Huanjiang 547100,China)
出处 《生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第16期5611-5619,共9页 Acta Ecologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41571130073) 中国科学院创新交叉团队。
关键词 喀斯特 氢氧稳定同位素 水分来源 IsoSource模型 MixSIAR模型 生态水文 karst hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes plant water sources IsoSource model MixSIAR model ecohydrology
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献182

共引文献279

同被引文献206

引证文献12

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部