期刊文献+

DCE-MRI药代动力学参数评估患癌胰腺不同区域功能状态的价值研究

The Value of DCE-MRI Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Evaluating the Functional Status of Different Regions of Pancreatic Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较胰腺癌(pancreatic cancer,pCa)患者癌灶区、近端胰腺区、远端炎性区及正常胰腺的动态对比增强磁共振成像(dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI,DCE-MRI)药代动力学参数K^(trans)和k(ep),无创量化患癌胰腺不同区域微血管功能状态,评估pCa近端胰腺组织是否为相对正常的胰腺组织。方法:收集病理及临床证实的pCa患者29例腿机选取正常志愿者30例。所有受试者行胰腺DCE-MRI扫描并计算每个观测区的K^(trans)和k(ep)。根据患癌胰腺不同区域状态的差异将其分为pCa组、癌灶近端胰腺组、癌灶远端炎症组,30例正常志愿者胰腺为正常对照组。采用One-way ANOVA分别比较不同组别间K^(trans)s、k(ep)的差异。结果源腺癌、近端胰腺区、远端炎症区及正常胰腺的K^(trans)和k(ep)分别是0.114±0.023、0.066±0.009、0.323±0.026、0.061±0.005和0.341±0.077、0.105±0.017、0.772±0.068、0.107±0.005。pCa的K^(trans)和k(ep)高于近端胰腺区和正常胰腺,而低于远端炎症区,远端炎症区的K^(trans)和k(ep)高于pCa、近端胰腺区和正常胰腺,以上P均<0.001;而近端胰腺和正常胰腺的K^(trans)和k(ep)均无统计学差异(P=0.298、0.893)。结论患癌胰腺不同区域微血管功能状态有明显差异同时提示pCa近端≥1 cm的区域为相对正常的胰腺区,以上可为pCa精准治疗、手术切缘选择提供参考。 Objective:To compare dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI(DCE-MRI)pharmacokinetic parameters Ktrans,kep of normal pancreas and the tumor region,proximal pancreatic region,distal inflammatory region in patients with pancreatic cancer,and to non-invasively quantify the functional status of different regions of the pancreas with cancer.To evaluate whether the proximal pancreatic tissue adjacent to pCa is normal.Methods:29 histologically and clinically proven patients with pancreatic cancer and 30 normal volunteers underwent DCE-MRI.DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters(Ktransand kep)for each observation region were calculated.Pancreases with cancer were divided into pancreatic cancer,proximal pancreas and distal inflammation groups.Pancreases of 30 normal volunteers were as normal control group.One-way ANOVA test were used to evaluate the differences of Ktrans and kep among different groups.Results:Ktrans and kep in pancreatic cancer,proximal pancreatic region,distal inflammatory region and normal pancreas were 0.114±0.023,0.066±0.009,0.323±0.026,0.061±0.005 and 0.341±0.077,0.05±0.017,0.772±0.068 and 0.107±0.005,respectively.The Ktransand kep of pCa were higher than that of proximal pancreas region and normal pancreas,and lower than that of distal inflammatory region(P all<0.001).However there were no significant differences of Ktrans and kep between proximal pancreas region and normal pancreas(P=0.298,0.893).Conclusion:There are differences of microcirculation function for different regions of pancreases with cancer.Proximal pancreas region away from tumor≥1 cm is relatively normal pancreas.These provide references for precise treatment and surgical margin selection of pancreatic cancer.
作者 赵娓娓 宦怡 郑敏文 张劲松 田健 全志永 ZHAO Wei-wei;HUAN Yi;ZHENG Min-wen;ZHANG Jin-song;TIAN Jian;QUAN Zhi-yong(Department of Radiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University,Xi'an,Shaanxi,710032,China;Department of Nuclear Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University,Xi'an,Shaanxi,710032,China)
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2020年第16期3011-3016,共6页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81220108011) 西京医学学科助推计划(XJZT19ML03)。
关键词 胰腺癌 动态对比增强磁共振成像 药代动力学参数 功能状态 Pancreatic cancer Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Pharmacokinetic parameters Functional status
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献26

  • 1TutUs PS, Brix G, Buekley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic cuntrast-enhaneed T-weighted MRI of a dittusible tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Resun hnaging, 1999,10:223-232.
  • 2Murase K. Efficient method for calculating kinetic parametetes using T2+-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Resort Meal,2004,51:858-862.
  • 3Bali MA, Metens T, Denolin V, et al. Pancreatic perfusion: noninvasive quantitative assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging without and with secretin stimulation in healthy volunteers. Initial results. Radiology, 2008, 247: 115-121.
  • 4Yu CW, Shill TF, Hsu CY, et al. Correlation between pancreatic microcuireulation and type 2 diabetes in patients with coronary artery disease: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology, 2009,252 : 704 -711.
  • 5Xu J, l.iang Z, Hao S, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: dynamic 64-slice helical CT with perfusion imaging. Abdom hnaging,2009, 34:759-766.
  • 6Coenegraehts K, Van Steenbergen W, De Keyzer F, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of tile pancreas: initial reslllts in healthy volunteers and patients with ehronie panereatitis. J MagnReson hnaging, 2004, 20:990-997.
  • 7Jakobsen 1, Lyng tt, Kaalhus O, et al. MRI ot human lion,or xenograffis in vivo: proton relaxation time and extraccllular tutnor volume. Magn Resort Imaging, 1995,13:693-700.
  • 8AreI I, Chaudhari AFI, Bailey KL,, et aI. Comparison of tumoe histology to dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resollame imaging-based physiological estimates. Magn I/eson Imaging, 2008,26 : 1279-1293.
  • 9Muraoka N, Uematsu H, Kimura 1t, et al. Apparent diffuahm eoefI'icienlt in pancreatic, cancer characterization arid histopathological con'elations. J Magn lleson Imaging, 2008, 27: 1302-1308.
  • 10Coenegrachts K, Van Steenbergen W, De Keyzer F.et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI ut the pancreas: initial rescdts in heahhy volunteers and patients with hronic pancreatitis. J Magn Reson Imaging,2004, 20:990-997.

共引文献226

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部