期刊文献+

西方社会公正观念史中的“应得”问题及其理论启示 被引量:5

“Merit”in the History of Western Notions of Justice and Its Theoretical Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 西方社会公正观念史的语境中,分配正义有一条清晰的思想行进路径,即“应得”:人之为人,各安其位、各尽其职、各取其份、各得其所。具体而言,古希腊哲人的“德性”、中世纪神学的“秩序”、近代思想家的“权利”、现代思想家的“功利”和当代思想家的“自由”无不体现出各具时代特征的“应得”向度。不可忽视,由古代德性主义、中世纪神权主义、近代权利主义、现代功利主义以及当代新自由主义构成的五大公正原则,对当下社会的公平正义构建具有一定意义的理论镜鉴,诸如主体意识的激活、道德修为的提升、个性自由的尊重、生命伦理的关怀,等等。但是,无论其中的美德、理性、权利,抑或其中的意志、自由、和谐,都不是现实的公正而是抽象的公正;不是革命性的公正而是保守性的公正;不是实质上的公正而是形式上的公正;不是属于劳动人民的公正而是属于一部分阶级、一部分群体的公正。对之,我们需在实践中加以辩证分析。 In the context of the history of western notions of justice,distributive justice has a clear ideological path,namely“merit”:human is called human mainly because each person assumes his or her position,discharges his or her duties,acquires his or her own share and has his or her place.Concretely speaking,the“virtue”of ancient Greek philosophers,the“order”of medieval theology,the“right”of thinkers in modern times,the“utility”of thinkers in contemporary age and the“freedom”of contemporary thinkers embody the“merit”dimensions with different characteristics of the times all without exception.It can not be neglected that the major five principles of fairness constituted by ancient moral integrity doctrine,medieval theocraticism,authoritarianism in modern times,utilitarianism in contemporary age as well as Neoliberalism in an epoch have a theoretical reference of certain significance for the construction of equality and justice in the current society,such as the activation of subject consciousness,the promotion of ethical cultivation,the respect of individual freedom and the concern of life ethics.However,whether the virtue,the reason,the right in them or the will,the freedom,the harmony in them are not the realistic justice but the abstract justice;not the revolutionary justice but the conservative justice;not the substantial justice but the formal justice;not the justice which belongs to the working people but the justice which belongs to a portion of class and a portion of populations.Hereto,we need to make a dialectic analysis of them during practice.
作者 汪盛玉 WANG Sheng-yu(School of Marxism,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu Anhui 241002,China)
出处 《安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期44-53,共10页 Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(18BKS157)。
关键词 分配 分配正义 西方社会公正观念史 “应得”问题 理论启示 distribution distributive justice history of western notions of justice “merit”issue theoretical enlightenment
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1[古希腊]柏拉图:《理想国》,郭斌和、张竹明译,北京:商务印书馆,1986年,第8页.
  • 2[古希腊]亚里士多德:《尼各马可伦理学》,廖申白译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,第134-136页.
  • 3[古希腊]亚里士多德:《政治学》,吴寿彭译,北京:商务印书馆,1965年,第148-150页.
  • 4Samuel FIeischacker, A Short History of Distributive Justice, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004, p.6.
  • 5John Rawls, Justice as Fairness, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 2001, pp.58--59.
  • 6[意大利]阿奎那:《阿奎那政治著作选》,马清槐译,北京:商务印书馆,1963年,第141—143页.
  • 7Samuel Fleischacker, A Short History of Distributive Justice, MA : Harvard University Press, 2004, p.21 ; pp.68--70.
  • 8Brian Tierney, Medival Poor Law, Berkeley : University of California Press, 1959, p.61.
  • 9[英]洛克:《政府论》,叶启芳、瞿菊农译,北京:商务印书馆,1964年,第19页.
  • 10John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, MA: Harvmxt University Press, 1999, p.89.

共引文献38

同被引文献72

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部