试论多纪元简对金漥七朗《素问考》的借鉴和袭用

Discussion on the reference and use of Duojiyuanjian to Jinwaqilang’s Sunwenkao

本文认为日本幕府时期的学者金漥七朗与另一位著名学者多纪元简是同时代人,并有学术来往。多纪元简《素问记闻》与金漥七朗《素问考》多同而亦有增删,多纪元简《素问识》对《素问考》之取舍又有所不同。《素问记闻》是《素问考》的一个基本忠实的过录本,《素问识》则是以《素问考》为基础,大量采用原作的材料、也增加一些新的材料,有时袭用原作观点、也有很多新的观点,重新组织而成的一部《素问》语词注释新书。多纪元坚及森立之、伊泽棠轩也见过《素问考》,但多纪氏同门数代学人对《素问识》与《素问考》之高度相似的事实保持了长期的沉默。多纪元简的学养和见识高于金漥七朗,而后者对于包括前者在内的许多学者的《素问》研究之重要奠基作用应当得到史家的客观评定。

The author argues that the scholar Jinwaqilang in the Shogunate period and another famous scholar Duojiyuanjian are contemporaries,and they have contacts in academic.The Duojiyuanjian’s Suwen Jiwen are mostly the same as Jinwaqilang’s Suwenkao,but they have been added and deleted respectively.The Duojiyuanjian’s Suwen Jiwen has different choice of Jinwaqilang’s Suwenkao.Suwen Jiwen is a basically faithful transcription of Suwenkao.Suwenshi,based on Suwenkao,is a new book of word annotations of Suwen reorganized by adding some new materials and sometimes adopting many new ideas from the original text.Duojiyuanjian,Senlizhi and Yizeshangxuan may have seen Suwenkao,but the scholars of the same family for several generations kept a long silence on the fact that Suwenshi and suwenkao were highly similar.The learning and knowledge of Duojiyuanjian is better than that of Jinwaqilang,while the latter has an important foundation-laying role in studying Suwen including the former and many other scholars,and it should be evaluated objectively by historians.