血管造影与介入治疗对胃肠道肿瘤的诊治价值和临床意义

Value and Clinical Significance of Angiography and Interventional Therapy in Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

目的分析血管造影与介入治疗对胃肠道肿瘤的诊治价值和临床意义。方法在该院患者中方便选取2018年10月-2019年9月共60例胃肠道肿瘤患者作为该次研究对象,对患者采取血管造影与介入治疗,邀请患者填写焦虑/抑郁自评量表评分并比较,比较患者血管造影与介入治疗前后的生活质量,比较患者血管造影与介入治疗前后的疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分。结果治疗前患者心理SAS(56.3±5.5)分和SDS评分(58.1±3.9)分高于治疗后患者心理SAS(45.2±4.3)分和SDS评分(42.8±6.3)分,差异有统计学意义(t=16.140、46.000,P=0.000、0.000);治疗前患者的心理功能(70.3±7.2)分、生理功能(72.1±7.5)分、社会功能(74.2±7.1)分和物质生活(73.6±7.2)分低于治疗后患者的心理功能(89.2±8.1)分、生理功能(86.2±8.1)分、社会功能(86.5±8.6)分和物质生活(87.6±8.4)分,差异有统计学意义(t=13.500、9.890、8.540、9.800,P=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000);治疗后患者VAS评分(3.5±1.2)分低于治疗前的VAS评分(6.2±2.2)分,差异有统计学意义(t=8.346,P=0.000)。结论对胃肠道肿瘤患者采用血管造影与介入治疗,有着不错的治疗效果,血管造影与介入治疗在临床对胃肠道肿瘤患者的治疗中具有推广价值。

Objective To analyze the value and clinical significance of angiography and interventional therapy in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal tumors.Methods In the hospital patients to choose in October 2018 to September2019,a total of 60 patients with gastrointestinal tumor as the research object,angiography and interventional therapy on the patients,invited to fill in patients with anxiety/depression self rating scale score and compare,compare the quality of life of patients before and after angiography and interventional treatment,compared before and after the angiography and interventional treatment in patients with pain visual analogue scale(VAS)score.Results The psychological SAS(56.3±5.5)points and SDS score(58.1±3.9)points of the patients before treatment were higher than the psychological SAS(45.2±4.3)points and SDS scores(42.8±6.3)points of the patients after treatment,the difference was statistically significant(t=16.140,46.000,P=0.000,0.000);the psychological function(70.3±7.2)points,physiological function(72.1±7.5)points,social function(74.2±7.1)points,and material life(73.6±7.2)points of the patients before treatment were lower than those of the patients after treatment(89.2±8.1)points,physiological function(86.2±8.1)points,social function(86.5±8.6)points and material life(87.6±8.4)points,the difference was statistically significant(t=13.500,9.890,8.540,9.800,P=0.000,0.000,0.000,0.000);patients with VAS after treatment,the score(3.5±1.2)points was lower than the VAS score(6.2±2.2)points before treatment,the difference was statistically significant(t=8.346,P=0.000).Conclusion The use of angiography and interventional therapy for gastrointestinal cancer patients has a good therapeutic effect.