3See MPOTEC GmbH [ 20061 B. C. C. 681 ( Commercial Court of Nanterre, 15 February 2006), In re SPhinX, Ltd. 351 B.R. 103 (S. D, New York, 6 September 2006), and Re Kaupthing Capital Partners H Master LP Inc (in admin. ) [20101 EWHC 836 (Ch), [2011] B. C. C 338 (1 April 2010, Chancery Division, Proudman J. ). .
4See Jay Westbrook, "An Empirical Study of the Implementation in the United States of the Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency" (2012) 87 Am. Bankr. L.J. 247, 269. (Appendix Table 1 Chapter 15 Filings by Countries) (Spring 2013) for statistics in the United States.
5UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross - Border Insolvency, Art. 2(f) ( " ' Establishment' means any place of operations where the debtor carries out a non - transitory economic activity with human means and goods or services. " ). Model Law, Art. 2(b).
6H.R. Rep. 109 -31, pt. 1, 109th Cong. 1st Sess. at 112 - 113 (2005).
7see also, Re Tri - Continental Exchange Ltd 349 B.R. 629, 635, per Judge Klein; In Re Bear Stearns High - Grade Structured Credit Strategies Master Fund Ltd 374 BR 122, per Judge Lifland. .
8Re Stanford International Bank Ltd( In Receivership) [ 2009 ] EWHC 1441 (Ch), 2009 WL 1949459, para. 65 (High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Companies Court, Justice Lewison, 3 July 2009).
9Re Daisyteck- ISA Ltd & Ors [2003 ] B. C. C. 562, 566, para. 14 (Judge McConigal, Leeds District Registry, Chancery Division, 16 May 2003).
10MPOTEC GmbH [2006 ] B. C. C. 681, 6$6 (Commercial Court of Nanterre, 15 February 2006).
