摘要
以某高校二年级英语专业和非英语专业的158名学生为例,组成高低水平组参加试验。研究结果表明:高低水平组学习者学习生词时,“刻学”方式明显优于“附习”方式,尤其适合高水平学习者使用。高低水平学习者通过“附习”方式对学习习语和多义词作用较小,而通过“刻学”方式学习习语,效果明显优于“附习”,这对高水平组效果更明显;对多义词的学习,高低水平学习者通过“刻学”均获得一定的学习效果,学习水平高低对通过“刻学”方式学习多义词影响较大。
Taking 158 students of English major and non-English major in the second year of a university as anexample,the high and low level group was formed to participate in the experiment.The results show that the method of“deliberate vocabulary learning”is obviously better than the method of“incidental vocabulary acquisition”,which is especially suitable for high-level learners.The“incidental vocabulary acquisition”method has little effect on the learning of idioms and polysemants,but the effect of“deliberatevocabulary acquisition”method is obviously better than that of“incidental vocabulary acquisition”,which is more obvious for the high-level group.For the learning of polysemants,learners in the high and low level groups can achieve certain learning effects through“deliberate vocabulary learning”,and the learning level has a great influence on the learning of polysemants by“deliberate vocabulary learning”.
作者
梁端俊
LIANG Duanjun(School of Foreign Languages, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou 239000, Anhui, China)
出处
《安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2020年第3期36-39,共4页
Journal of Anhui University of Technology:Social Sciences
基金
安徽省级一流专业“双万”计划项目:商务英语(2019swjh04)
滁州学院校级重点教研项目:“双万计划”与“国标”背景下应用型本科商务英语专业、行业、授业、学业、毕业、就业、创业一体化建设与实践(2019jyz030)。
关键词
附带词汇习得
刻意词汇学习
习语
incidental vocabulary acquisition
deliberate vocabulary learning
idioms