期刊文献+

位置重复性对射波刀模体绝对剂量验证的影响 被引量:2

Effect of position repeatability on the verification of absolute dose for CyberKnife
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对医院新引进的射波刀按照国际原子能机构(IAEA)TRS-398号报告进行模体绝对剂量测量,进而探索水模体位置的重复性对治疗计划绝对剂量验证通过率的影响,确保输出剂量更加精准地投照到患者肿瘤。方法:选取60、40和25 mm 3种准直器按照正面入射、侧面入射和混合入射方式分别设计3个计划,采用德国PTW公司的UNIDOSEwebline型静电计和TW310100.125cc指形电离室测量绝对剂量。结果:每一组实验3种不同准直器测量对治疗计划绝对剂量的TPS计算值与实际测量值之间的偏差基本一致(小于0.7%)。当射束全部从模体的正面入射时,无论是单射束还是多个射束,验证偏差均在2%左右;随着侧向射束的引入,其值由3%左右逐渐增大到4%左右;甚至当射束全部从侧向入射时,偏差达5%以上;但将模体固定之后再重复测量,即使在侧向射束也存在的条件下,偏差下降为2%左右。结论:模体空间相对位置的重复性是引起计划系统计算结果和实际测量结果之间偏差增大的主要原因。 Objective To measure the absolute dose delivered to phantom on newly introduced CyberKnife according to IAEATRS-398 report for exploring the effect of the position repeatability of water phantom on the passing rate of absolute dose verification,thereby ensuring that the prescription dose is accurately delivered to the tumors.Methods Three types of collimators(60,40 and 25 mm)were used to design 3 different plans based on different incident directions of the beams which included normal incidence,lateral incidence and mixed incidence.The absolute dose was measured by UNIDOSwebline electrometer from PTW,Germany,and TW310100.125cc finger ionization chamber.Results Trivial dose deviations(less than 0.7%)were observed between the absolute dose calculated by treatment planning system and measured results for 3 types of collimators in each group of experiments.The verification deviation was about 2%,when the radiation beams entered the phantom at a normal incidence regardless of single beams or multi beams.With some radiation beams entering the phantom at a lateral incidence,the deviation was gradually increased from 3% to 4%.When all beams entered the phantom at a lateral incidence,the deviation was up to 5%.However,after the phantom was fixed,the deviation was reduced to about 2% even there were radiation beams at a lateral incidence.Conclusion The main reason for the increasing deviation between the results calculated by treatment planning system and the results measured by electrometer is the repeatability of the relative position of phantom.
作者 王琳 WANG Lin(Department of Radiation Oncology,Fujian Medical University Union Hospital,Fuzhou 350001,China)
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2020年第9期1107-1110,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
基金 福建省科技厅引导性项目(2019Y0020)。
关键词 射波刀 模体绝对剂量验证 位置重复性 射束 CyberKnife verification of phantom absolute dose position repeatability radiation beams
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献36

  • 1张惠玲,李勤,全红,韩军.MatriXX在IMRT剂量验证中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2011,28(2):2455-2459. 被引量:16
  • 2IAEA. Absorbed Dose Determination in Photon and Electron Beams: An International Code of Practice, Technical Reports Series No. 277 (2nd edn in 1997)[M]. Vienna: IAEA, 1987.
  • 3AAPM TG-51. Clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams[J]. Med Phys, 1999, 26(9): 1847-1871.
  • 4IAEA. Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water, Technical Report Series No.398[M]. Vienna: IAEA, 2000.
  • 5AAPM TG-21. A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams [J]. Med Phys, 1983, 10 (6): 741-771.
  • 6Burns JE. Conversion of PDD for photon beams from one SSD to another and calculation of TAR, TMR and TPR. In: Central axis depth dose data for use in radiotherapy: 1996, BJR Supplement 25[M]. London: British Institute of Radiology. 1996: 153-157.
  • 7Accuray Inc. Physice essentials guide [M]. Sunnyvale: Accuray Incorporated. 2006: 2-62/2-81.
  • 8Huq MS, Andreo P, Song H. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Phys Med Biol. 2001 Nov;46 (11):2985-3006.
  • 9Lopez Medina A, Teijeiro A, Salvador F, et al. Comparison between TG-51 and TRS-398: electron contamination effect on photon beam-quality specification. Phys Med Biol. 2004 Jan 7;49(1):17-32.
  • 10Araki F, Kubo HD. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols. Med Phys. 2002 May;29 (5):857--68.

共引文献21

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部