摘要
目的对比分析超声造影引导下单极射频消融(M-RFA)与无接触多极射频消融(No-touch RFA)治疗肝肿瘤的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析在我院行超声造影引导下M-RFA和No-touch RFA治疗肝肿瘤的94例患者(M-RFA组44例,No-touch RFA组50例)的检查资料,比较两组患者术后病灶灭活范围和灭活率,以及治疗前后实验室检查指标的差异;随访24个月,观察患者的无瘤生存率。结果射频消融后,超声造影测量M-RFA组肿瘤灭活范围平均值为38.36 mm×31.31 mm,No-touch RFA组为46.70 mm×35.82 mm;M-RFA组完全灭活率为90.9%(40/44),No-touch RFA组为98.00%(49/50),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。M-RFA组21例患者甲胎蛋白阳性,RFA术后1个月9例明显下降,12例转阴;No-touch RFA组20例患者甲胎蛋白阳性,RFA术后1个月6例明显下降,14例转阴,两组术前术后比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。术后随访24个月,M-RFA组无瘤生存率为47.72%(21/44),No-touch RFA组为68.00%(34/50),差异有统计学意义(P=0.041)。结论超声造影引导下No-touch RFA治疗肝肿瘤有助于提高肿瘤的灭活率,疗效显著,无瘤生存率高,较M-RFA临床应用价值更佳。
Objective To investigate the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)guided monopolar radiofrequency ablation(M-RFA)and no-touch multipole radiofrequency ablation(No-touch RFA)in the treatment of liver tumors.Methods A total of 94 cases of liver tumors patients treated with M-RFA and No-touch RFA under the guidance of real-time CEUS in our hospital were enrolled,including 44 cases of M-RFA group and 50 cases of No-touch RFA group.The postoperative lesion inactivation range,inactivation rate and lab examination indexes before and after treatment were compared.The patients were followed up regularly for 24 months and the tumor-free survival rate was recorded.Results After treatment,the average inactivation range of the M-RFA group and the No-touch RFA group by CEUS were 38.36 mm×31.31 mm and 46.70 mm×35.82 mm,respectively.The total inactivation rate of the M-RFA group and the No-touch RFA group were 90.9%(40/44)and 98.00%(49/50),respectively.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,21 AFP positive patients in the M-RFA group,12 cases were transferred into negative AFP and serum AFP level in 9 cases decreased significantly 1 month after treatment.20 AFP positive patients in the No-touch RFA group,14 cases were transferred into negative AFP and serum AFP level in 6 cases decreased significantly 1 month after treatment.The difference of preoperative and postoperative AFP levels between the two groups were statistically significant(both P<0.05).Regular follow-up to 24 months after treatment showed that the tumor-free survival rate was 47.72%(21/44)in the M-RFA group and 68.00%(34/50)in the No-touch RFA group,and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.041).Conclusion CEUS guided No-touch RFA treatment of liver tumors is helpful to improve the tumor inactivation rate with significant efficacy and high tumor-free survival rate,which has better application value than M-RFA.
作者
陈萍
唐春霖
陈凯旋
谭鹰
马宽生
夏锋
冯凯
柴跃龙
郭燕丽
CHEN Ping;TANG Chunlin;CHEN Kaixuan;TAN Ying;MA Kuansheng;XIA Feng;FENG Kai;CHAI Yuelong;GUO Yanli(Department of Ultrasound,the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China)
出处
《临床超声医学杂志》
CSCD
2020年第9期647-650,共4页
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine
基金
国家国际科技合作专项项目(2015DFA30920)
重庆市科技研发基地建设计划(国际科技合作)项目(cstc2014gjhz110004)。
关键词
超声检查
造影剂
射频消融
单极
多极
肝肿瘤
Ultrasonography
Contrast agent
Radiofrequency ablation
Monopolar
Multipolar
Liver tumors