期刊文献+

Logistic回归分析瘢痕子宫再次妊娠产妇阴道分娩妊娠结局的影响因素 被引量:11

Logistic regression analysis of factors affecting outcome of vaginal delivery in pregnant women with scar uterus re-pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究瘢痕子宫再次妊娠孕妇阴道分娩妊娠结局影响因素。方法选取2017年1月至2018年12月山东省单县东大医院建档并进行按期体检的300例瘢痕子宫再次妊娠产妇作为研究对象。根据妊娠结局分为妊娠良好组(n=210)及妊娠不良组(n=90),统计妊娠不良产妇的妊娠结局。从年龄、产前体重指数、子宫瘢痕厚度、距上次剖宫产手术时间和有无阴道分娩史等方面分析妊娠不良组产妇与分娩良好组产妇的区别;分析瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩出现不良妊娠结局的危险因素。结果90例妊娠不良组产妇中出现产后出血43例(47.78%),产褥感染20例(22.22%),新生儿窒息10例(11.11%),子宫破裂9例(10.00%),子宫切除8例(8.89%);与妊娠良好组产妇相比,妊娠不良组产妇的年龄更高、产前体重指数显著升高、子宫瘢痕厚度显著下降,差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);与妊娠良好组产妇相比,妊娠不良组产妇的自然分娩史率下降、临产入院率升高,差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);与妊娠良好组产妇相比,妊娠不良组产妇家庭月收入更低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。以妊娠是否良好作为自变量,对以上结果中分析得出的具有统计学差异的因变量进行拟合多因素逐步Logistic回归分析,结果显示,年龄>30、产前体重指数>30kg/m^2、子宫瘢痕厚度≤4mm及家庭月收入<500元是瘢痕子宫再次妊娠孕妇阴道分娩妊娠结局的独立危险因素,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论瘢痕子宫再次妊娠经阴道分娩是一项可行措施,年龄>30、产前体重指数>30kg/m^2、子宫瘢痕厚度及家庭月收入<5000元是瘢痕子宫再次妊娠孕妇阴道分娩妊娠结局的独立危险因素,在今后的临床研究中应该注意以上因素的影响,以减少不良妊娠结局的发生率。 Objective To investigate the influencing factors of outcomes of vaginal delivery in pregnant women with scar uterus re-pregnancy.Methods 300 pregnant women with scar uterus re-pregnancy received antenatal care in our hospital from January 2017 to February 2018 were selected as the research object.According to the pregnancy outcome,they were divided into good pregnancy outcome group(210 cases)and adverse pregnancy outcome group(90 cases).The maternal age,prenatal body mass index(BMI),uterine scar thickness,time from the previous cesarean section,and history of vaginal delivery were compared between the two groups.Risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.Results Among the 90 cases of adverse pregnancy outcomes,there were 43 cases of postpartum hemorrhage,20 cases of puerperal infection,10 cases of neonatal asphyxia,9 cases of uterine rupture,and 8 cases of hysterectomy.Compared with the good pregnancy outcome group,the ages of pregnant women were higher,the prenatal body mass index was increased,the thickness of the uterine scar was decreased,all with statistically dignificant differences(all P<0.05).The probability of spontaneous childbirth was decreased,the probability of admission to hospital was increased,both with statistically dignificant differences(all P<0.05),and the monthly income of the family was decreased,with statistically dignificant difference(P<0.05).Using the pregnancy status as an independent variable,the statistically significant dependent variables were analyzed by multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis.The results showed that age>30,prenatal BMI>30 kg/m^2,uterine scar thickness≤4 mm and family monthly income<5000 Yuan were all independent risk factor for gestational outcome of vaginal delivery in pregnant women with scar uterus re-pregnancy(P<0.05).Conclusions Vaginal delivery is a feasible measure for scar uterus re-pregnancy.Age>30,prenatal BMI>30 kg/m^2,uterine scar thickness≤4 mm and family monthly income<5000 Yuan are independent risk factors for gestational outcome of vaginal delivery in pregnant women with scar uterus re-pregnancy.In the future clinical research,more attention should be paid to the influence of above factors to increase the incidence of good pregnancy outcomes.
作者 安然 李丽 AN Ran;LI Li(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Dongda Hospital of Shan County,Heze 274300,Shandong,China)
出处 《中国性科学》 2020年第8期39-41,共3页 Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality
关键词 瘢痕子宫 再妊娠 阴道分娩 妊娠结局 影响因素 Scar uterus Re-pregnancy Vaginal delivery Pregnancy outcome Influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献145

  • 1郑平,黄醒华,王淑珍.35年剖宫产率及适应证的变化[J].中华妇产科杂志,1996,31(3):142-145. 被引量:225
  • 2李源,赵艳晖,孙波,张为远.剖宫产指征的变迁及其影响因素[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(1):30-33. 被引量:69
  • 3Mdrquez-Calderon S,Ruiz-Ramos M,Juarez S,et al.Caesarean delivery in Andalusia,spainrrelationship with social,clinical and health services factors(2007-2009).Rev Esp Salud Publica,2011, 85(2):205-215.
  • 4Betrain AP,Merialdi M,Lauer JA,et al.Ratew of caesarean section: analysis of global,regional and natimales.Paediatr Perinat,2007, 21(2):98.
  • 5Souza JP,Papinelli MA,Amaral E,et al.Obstenic care and severe pregnancy complications in latin America and the Caribbean:an analysis of information from demographic health surveys.Rev Pansm Salud Publica,2007,21(6):396.
  • 6Lumbiganon P,Laopaiboon M,Gülmezoglu AM,et al.Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia:the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08[J].Lancet,2010,375(9713):490-499.
  • 7Guise JM,Denman MA,Emeis C,et al.Vaginal birth after cesarean:new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes[J].Obstet Gynecol,2010,115(6):1267-1278.
  • 8McC ourt C,Weaver J,Statham H,et al.Elective cesarean section and decision making:a critical review of the literature[J].Birth,2007,34(1):65-79.
  • 9American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 115 :Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery[ J]. Obstet Gy- necol,2010,116(2 Pt 1 ) :450 -463.
  • 10Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth, number 155 ( replaces guideline number 147 ) [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2005,89 ( 3 ) : 319 -331.

共引文献625

同被引文献133

引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部