期刊文献+

Development and subassemblage cyclic testing of hybrid buckling-restrained steel braces 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 Buckling-restrained braced frames(BRBFs) are vulnerable to relatively higher post-earthquake residual drifts under high intensity ground shakings. This is primarily due to the low axial elastic and post-elastic stiffness of bucklingrestrained braces(BRBs) satisfying the design force demand requirements. In the present study, a hybrid buckling restrained bracing system consisting of a short yielding core length BRB component and a conventional buckling-type brace component connected in series has been developed with an aim to increase the axial stiffness of braces. This study is focused on the experimental investigation of six hybrid bucking restrained braces(HBRBs) to investigate their overall behavior, loadresisting capacity, strength-adjustment factors and energy dissipation potential. The main parameters varied are the crosssectional area, the yielding length of core elements as well as the detailing of buckling-restraining system of short yielding core length BRBs. Test results showed that the HBRBs with yielding core length in the range of 30% of work-point to workpoint lengths withstood an axial strain of 6% without any instability and can deliver stable and balanced hysteretic response and excellent energy dissipation under reversed cyclic loading conditions.
出处 《Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration》 SCIE EI CSCD 2020年第4期967-983,共17页 地震工程与工程振动(英文刊)
基金 Department of Science and Technology,Govt. of India for the financial assistance to carry out this experimental work under sponsored project No. IITD/IRD/RP02619。
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1[1]American Institute of Steel Construction (2001), Manual of Steel Construction - Load and Resistance Factor Design, 3rd Edition.
  • 2[2]American Institute of Steel Construction (2002), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings.
  • 3[3]American Institute of Steel Construction/Structural Engineers Association of California (2001 ),Recommended Provisions for Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames, (draft).
  • 4[4]Black C J, Makris N and Aiken ID (2002), "Component Testing, Stability Analysis and Characterization of Buckling Restrained ‘Unbonded' Braces," Technical Report PEER 2002/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley,CA.
  • 5[5]Clark P, Kasai K, Aiken ID and Kimura Ⅰ (2000),"Evaluation of Design Methodologies for Structures Incorporating Steel Unbonded Braces for Energy Dissipation," Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Upper Hut, New Zealand,Paper No. 2240.
  • 6[6]Fahnestock LA, Ricles JM and Sause R (2004), "Refined Inelastic Truss Bar Element (Type 01) with Isotropic Hardening for DRAIN-2DX, Element Description and User Guide," ATLSS Report in preparation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
  • 7[7]Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000a),NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures,Part l - Provisions, FEMA 368, Washington, D.C.Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000b),
  • 8[8]NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures,Part 2 - Commentary, FEMA 369, Washington, D.C.
  • 9[9]Garlock M (2002), "Full Scale Testing, Seismic Analysis,and Design of Post-Tensioned Seismically Resistant Connections for Steel Frames," Ph.D. dissertation,Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
  • 10[10]International Code Council (2000), International Building Code, Falls Church, VA.

共引文献12

同被引文献17

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部