回归契约本位——对仲裁时效的体系化构建

Return to Contract Standard—Systematic building of arbitration limitation

仲裁时效与诉讼时效承载不同的程序法理,却基本适用相同的时效规定,这归咎于仲裁法中仲裁时效规则的阙如致使仲裁时效受到诉讼时效法定性的约束。仲裁时效既然作为判断仲裁请求成立的依据之一,就应当贯彻当事人意思自治原则,确立多元仲裁时效体系,构建法定仲裁时效与约定仲裁时效双重结构,顺应仲裁的契约本位。同时,仲裁时效中止、中断适用的规则亟须与实体法保持一致,以形成逻辑严密的仲裁时效制度。

The limitation of arbitration and limitation of action bear different procedural jurisprudence,but they basically apply the same prescription. This is due to the absence of the rules of limitation of arbitration in the arbitration law,which makes the limitation of arbitration subject to the statutory limitation of action. Since the limitation of arbitration is one of the bases for judging the establishment of arbitration claims,we should implement the principle of autonomy of the parties,establish a diverse-standard system of limitation of arbitration,construct a dual structure of statutory and agreed time limits of arbitration,and comply with the contractual standard of arbitration. Meanwhile,the application rules of the suspension and interruption of the limitation of arbitration should be consistent with the substantive law in order to form a strict logical system of limitation of arbitration.