期刊文献+

主动脉内球囊反搏联合体外膜肺氧合对心源性休克病人存活率及安全性的影响 被引量:4

Influences of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Combined with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation on Survival and Safety in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)联合体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)对心源性休克病人存活率及安全性的影响。方法回顾分析2014年9月—2018年3月石家庄市第一医院收治的心源性休克病人72例,根据治疗方式分为辅助组(39例)和对照组(33例)。对照组采用常规药物及呼吸支持治疗,辅助组在对照组基础上加用IABP和ECMO辅助支持治疗。比较两组病人治疗前后收缩压、舒张压、中心静脉压(CVP)、心率、肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、心脏指数(CI)、血浆脑钠肽(BNP)、急性生理功能和慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分及尿量,记录两组病人预后及并发症情况。结果两组治疗后收缩压、舒张压较治疗前升高,CVP、心率、PCWP较治疗前下降,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),辅助组治疗后收缩压、舒张压较对照组升高,CVP、心率、PCWP较对照组下降,但差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组治疗后LVEF、CI、尿量较治疗前增加(P<0.05),BNP、APACHEⅡ评分较治疗前降低(P<0.05);辅助组疗后LVEF、CI、尿量较治对照组增加(P<0.05);BNP、APACHEⅡ评分较对照组降低(P<0.05)。辅助组存活率高于对照组(P<0.05),两组神经压迫、出血、感染、下肢缺血发生率及存活者住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论ECMO联合IABP辅助治疗可以改善心源性休克病人心功能,提高病人存活率,且安全性较好。 Objective To observe intra-aortic balloon pump(IABP)combined with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO)on survival and safety in patients with cardiogenic shock.Methods The clinical data of 72 patients with cardiogenic shock from September 2014 to March 2018 were retrospectively analysed.The patients were divided into auxiliary group(n=39)and control group(n=33)according to the treatment method.The patients in control group were treated with conventional medicine and respiratory support,and the patients in auxiliary group were treated with IABP and ECMO on the basis of control group.Artery systolic blood pressure(SBP),artery diastolic blood pressure(DBP),central venous pressure(CVP),heart rate(HR),pulmonary capillary wedge pressure(PCWP),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),cardiac index(CI),plasma brain natriuretic peptide(BNP)levels,acute physiology and chronic health evaluation systemⅡ(APACHEⅡ)score and urine output before and after treatment were compared between two groups.Results Compared with data before treatment,SBP,DBP increased and CVP,HR,PCWP decreased after treatment in two groups,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05),the above indexes after treatment in auxiliary group was better than those in control group,but the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).After treatment,LVEF,CI,urine volume increased and BNP,APACHE-Ⅱscore decreased in the two groups(P<0.05),the data in auxiliary group were better than those in control group(P<0.05).The survival rate of auxiliary group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).There were no significant diffierences in nerve compression,hemorrhage,infection,lower limb ischemia,hospital stay of survival between two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion IABP combined with ECMO can improve the cardiac function and survival,and the security is good in patients with cardiogenic shock.
作者 蒙革 吴伟 冯海合 石银华 杨明华 殷珊珊 王晓洁 MENG Ge;WU Wei;FENG Haihe;SHI Yinhua;YANG Minghua;YIN Shanshan;WANG Xiaojie(First Hospital of Shijiazhuang/Affiliated People′s Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050011,Hebei,China)
出处 《中西医结合心脑血管病杂志》 2020年第17期2846-2849,共4页 Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine on Cardio-Cerebrovascular Disease
关键词 心源性休克 主动脉内球囊反搏 体外膜肺氧合 存活率 安全性 肺毛细血管楔压 脑钠肽 左室射血分数 intra-aortic balloon pump extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cardiogenic shock survival safety pulmonary capillary wedge pressure brain natriuretic peptide left ventricular ejection fraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献76

  • 1赵忠.体外膜肺氧合与心脏顿抑[J].中国循环杂志,1997,12(2):158-160. 被引量:1
  • 2龙村,胡盛寿,刘晋萍,孙寒松,黑飞龙,高国栋,宋云虎,刘迎龙,于坤,孙立忠,李景文.体外膜肺氧合支持治疗39例心肺功能衰竭患者的临床经验[J].中国循环杂志,2007,22(5):373-376. 被引量:18
  • 3Holmes DJ. Cardiogenic shock: a lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction. Rev Cardiovasc Med ,2003,4 : 131-135.
  • 4Perera D, Stables R, Thomas M, et al. Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 2010,304: 867 -874.
  • 5Ohman EM, Hochman JS. Aortic counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction: physiologically important but does the patient benefit? Am Heart J,2001,141:889-892.
  • 6Rognoni A, Cavallino C, Lupi A, et al. Aortic counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock during acute myocardial infarction. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther,2014,12:913-917.
  • 7Hochman JS, Buller CE, Sleeper LA, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction--etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock? J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,36:1063-1070.
  • 8Sjauw KD,Engstrom AE, Vis MM, et al. Efficacy and timing of intra-aortic counterpulsation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Neth Heart J ,2012,20:402-409.
  • 9Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II ) : final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet,2013,382:1638-1645.
  • 10Cheng JM, den Uil CA, Hoeks SE, et al. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta- analysis of controlled trials. Eur Heart J,2009,30:2102-2108.

共引文献245

同被引文献55

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部