期刊文献+

编码强度对字体大小效应的影响 被引量:1

Influence of encoding strength on the font size effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究采用3个实验考察编码强度对字体大小效应的影响,探讨由于知觉特征而引发的元认知错觉的内在产生机制(实验1)与有效的矫正措施(实验2和实验3)。结果发现:(1)大字体词语的知觉流畅性显著优于小字体,并且贝叶斯多层中介分析结果表明,知觉流畅性对字体大小效应起部分中介作用(实验1);(2)随着编码强度的增加,由字体大小引起的学习判断错觉逐渐消失(实验2和实验3)。以上结果表明,刺激的知觉特征(字体大小)对个体学习判断的影响,随编码强度激活线索的增加而逐渐减弱。这一结果为真实教学情境中提高学习者的编码强度,进而削弱学习判断对知觉特征线索的依赖,并准确地监测自身的学习进程提供了科学依据。 Judgments of learning(JOLs)are characterised as metacognitive judgments regarding the likelihood that studied items can be successfully retrieved in a future memory test.Previous studies found that people employ different types of cues to inform their online JOLs.Some of these cues can guide JOLs to accurately reflect memory status but others cannot(and are even misleading in some situations).A widely studied cue for JOL formation is subjective processing experience(e.g.,perceptual fluency)while completing a given task,which often confers metacognitive illusions.It has been found that people give higher JOLs to large than to small words,despite the fact that font size has minimal influence on retention,a phenomenon termed the font size effect on JOLs.A potential mechanism underlying the effect is perceptual fluency:Large words are perceived more fluently than small ones,and fluent processing experience of large words induces a feeling of knowing,which drives people to offer higher JOLs.The font size effect is important because it spotlights a dissociation between metacognitive judgments and memory itself.The current study aims to explore the influences of encoding strength on the font size effect,and to explore practical techniques to calibrate metacognitive illusions induced by perceptual fluency.Experiment 1 aimed to delineate the role of perceptual fluency in the font size effect.Twenty-six participants first completed a continuous identification(CID)task to measure the difference in perceptual fluency(indexed by response times;RTs)between large(70-pt)and small(9-pt)words,after which they attended a classic learning task.In the learning task,participants studied large and small words one-by-one,for 2 s each,and made item-by-item JOLs.Immediately following the learning task,they completed a distractor task,followed by a free recall test.The results showed that,in the CID task,participants responded much faster to large than to small words,indicating the natural difference in perceptual fluency between large and small words.In addition,perceptual fluency(i.e.,RTs in the CID task)significantly correlated with JOLs,reflecting the fluency effect on JOLs.More importantly,perceptual fluency significantly mediated the font size effect on JOLs,supporting the claim that perceptual fluency is responsible for the font size effect.Experiment 2 manipulated study durations to investigate the influence of enhancing encoding strength(through prolonging study duration)on the font size effect.Specifically,three groups of participants studied each word for 2 s,4 s,and 8 s,respectively,and made item-by-item JOLs.The results demonstrated that prolonging study duration correspondingly decreased the font size effect on JOLs.It is,however,worth highlighting that expanding study time cannot fully eliminate the font size effect because the results still showed a significant font size effect even when the study time was increased to 8 s.Experiment 3 was conducted to further investigate the effectiveness of enhancing encoding strength for calibration of the font size effect.A sentence-making group was instructed to encode each word by generating a sentence to deepen the level of processing(i.e.,encoding strength).By contrast,there were no explicit requirements of encoding strategies in the control group(i.e.,participants in the control group could use any strategies they liked).In the control group,the classic font size effect on JOLs was successfully replicated;of critical interest,the effect disappeared in the sentence-making group.Such results reflect the power of improving encoding strength to calibrate metacognitive illusions induced by perceptual features.In summary,the current study establishes that perceptual fluency is at least one of the mechanisms underlying the font size effect on JOLs;prolonging study duration reduces but fails to eliminate the font size effect on JOLs;more importantly,directly deepening the level of processing through sentence-making is a valid strategy to calibrate metacognitive illusions induced by perceptual features.Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in the main text.
作者 赵文博 姜英杰 王志伟 胡竞元 ZHAO Wenbo;JIANG Yingjie;WANG Zhiwei;HU Jingyuan(School of Psychology,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China)
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第10期1156-1167,共12页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(19BSH113)。
关键词 学习判断 字体大小效应 编码强度 元认知错觉 judgments of learning the font size effect encoding strength metacognitive illusions
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献115

  • 1沈大为,韩凯.FOK判断与可接近信息之间的关系[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):320-327. 被引量:9
  • 2范津,朱滢,田立.字符的知觉表征及其启动[J].心理学报,1995,27(2):145-151. 被引量:1
  • 3熊建萍,闫国利,白学军.高中二年级学生中文阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J].心理与行为研究,2007,5(1):60-64. 被引量:23
  • 4Alter, A. L,, & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency. Proceedings of National Academic Sciences, 103(24), 9369-9372.
  • 5Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569-576.
  • 6Arkes, H. R., Boehm, L. E., & Xu, G. (1991). Determinants of judged validity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 576-605.
  • 7Bacon, F. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5, 241-252.
  • 8Begg, I., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446-458.
  • 9Brown, A. S., & Nix, L. A. (1996). Turning lies into truths: Referential validation of falsehoods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1088-1100.
  • 10Hansen, J., Dechene, A., & Wanke, M. (2008), Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 687-691.

共引文献95

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部