期刊文献+

夫妻互动类型异同及其与婚姻质量的关系——对新冠肺炎疫情后婚姻干预的启示 被引量:1

The Association between Observed Interaction Profile and Relationship Satisfaction among Husbands and Wife:Implication to Marital Intervention after COVID-19 Epidemic
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用实验室观察法,对106对夫妻在问题解决和社会支持任务中的互动行为进行录像并编码,探索丈夫和妻子互动类型的异同及其与婚姻质量的关系,旨在为新冠肺炎疫情后婚姻干预提供建议。研究发现:(1)丈夫和妻子的互动类型呈现跨情境上"量"的变化,跨性别上"质"的差异。(2)"温暖支持型"和"敌意-退缩型"的丈夫和妻子,自己及配偶的婚姻质量都分别稳定地的居于最好和最差的一组。在问题解决情境中,"传统内敛型"、"微敌意型"的丈夫,与"温暖支持型"一样,其妻子婚姻质量都处于最好的一组;但"微敌意型"的妻子,其丈夫婚姻质量处于最差的一组;"理智型"和"激烈型"的妻子,其丈夫婚姻质量得分都处于较高的一组。研究根据以上结果对新冠肺炎疫情后婚姻干预的"关键互动模式""关键领域""关键对象"提出建议。 The COVID-19 epidemic affects individuals,families,and entire communities.Most research on post-disasters psychological reconstruction has focused on individuals’mental health outcomes,little attention focuses on relationship intervention.The purpose of this study is to explore the different interactive profiles among newlywed husband and wife and the association between these profiles and relationship satisfaction.Thus,evidence-based suggestions can be provided for marital intervention after the COVID-19 epidemic.The identified 106 newly-weds community couples were invited to the university lab to participate in this study.Husbands and wives were asked to separately complete self-report measures.And then,partners were reunited for four 10-min videotaped discussions:two problem-solving interactions and two social support interactions.The Chinese version Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scale coding system was used to encode the couples’videotapes.The Intra-class Correlation Coefficients reflecting inter-rater reliability were adequate in each interaction.Latent class analysis consistently revealed 3 profiles of husbands and wives’interactive behaviors across contexts:warmly supportive profile,low Hostile profile,and hostile-withdrawn profile.However,as in the problem-solving context,husbands are more likely to show traditionally undemonstrative profile than wives,wives are more likely to show volatile profile and reasonable profile than husbands.As in social support context,husbands also shows traditionally undemonstrative profile other than wife,and wife shows reasonable profile other than husbands.These finding indicated that husbands and wives were consistent in demonstrating of negativity(such as Low Hostile and Hostile-withdrawn)but different in demonstrating of positivity(such as traditionally undemonstrative profile in husbands,volatile profile and reasonable profile in wives)Warmly supportive class reported significantly highest levels of marital satisfaction and hostile withdrawn class reported the lowest levels of marital satisfaction consistently cross spouses and contexts.Wives’low hostility was associated with significant low marital satisfaction of husbands.However,husbands’low hostility was not associated with wives’marital satisfaction.Although wives who were in volatile class and reasonable class have not demonstrated typical warmly emotional expression,their husbands reported the highest marital satisfaction in the group.On the whole,wives show more emotional intensity than their husbands in both contexts,and husbands are more unexpressive and more warmly supportive in problem-solving and social support contexts for each.Furthermore,husbands’and wives’interactive styles have different meanings to their partners’marital satisfaction in certain ways.We speculated three suggestions to couple relationship intervention after the COVID-19 epidemic:(a)Couple education and couple therapy need to be differentiated based on different interactive types of a couple,(b)Couple intervention need to focus on training of"problem-solving"skill,(c)Clinicians need to take consider of sex difference in an interactive model of husbands and wives and motivated husbands involvement in the intervention.
作者 琚晓燕 李晓敏 兰菁 方晓义 Ju Xiaoyan;Li Xiaomin;Lan Jing;Fang Xiaoyi(School of Social Work,China Youth University for Political Sciences,Beijing,100089;Department of Family Studies and Human Development,University of Arizona,Tucson,85719;The Family Institute at Northwestem University Evanston,60201;Institute of Developmental Psychology,Bijing Normal Umivesity Beijing,10873)
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第4期977-983,共7页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(15BSH092)的资助。
关键词 互动类型 婚姻质量 婚姻干预 新冠肺炎疫情 interactive profile marital quality couple intervention COVID-19 epidemic
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献73

  • 1张美声.论性别观念与社会决策的关系[J].社会科学辑刊,1998(1):36-40. 被引量:4
  • 2周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3667
  • 3李雪燕,辛涛.特质焦虑的潜类别分析[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,42(6):610-614. 被引量:9
  • 4刘红云.如何描述发展趋势的差异:潜变量混合增长模型[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(3):539-544. 被引量:35
  • 5邱晧政.(2008).潜在类别模型的原理与技术.北京:教育科学出版社.
  • 6郑书凯.(2000).边际模式隐藏分类分析.硕士学位论文.国立中央大学.
  • 7周玉慧.夫妻间冲突应对策略类型及其影响[J].中华心理学刊,2009,51(1):81-100.
  • 8Benjamin, D. K., DeLong, E., & Steinbach, W. J. (2004). Latent Class Analysis: An Illustrative Application for Education in the Assessment of Resident Otoscopic Skills. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 4(1), 13-17.
  • 9Bertrand, E, Benichou. J. Grenier, P., & Chastang, C. (2005) Hui and Waiter's latent-class reference-free approach may be more useful in assessing agreement than diagnostic performance. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 688-700.
  • 10Biemer, P. E, Wiesen, & Christopher. (2002). Measurement Error Evaluation of Self-Reported Drug Use: A Latent Class Analysis of the US National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society,. 165(1). 97-119.

共引文献173

同被引文献21

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部