摘要
法律形式主义侧重演绎逻辑推演以及体系内的逻辑自洽性,其理想化、普适化的法律建构有着脱离社会实际的风险;实用道德主义强调法律的实用性,注重道德教化的作用,但在一定程度上不能使法律完全脱离法律之外的因素。片面的建构是充满局限的,面对非此即彼的二元悖论,多元的并存、互动和拉锯更能反映真切的社会现实。
Legal formalism emphasizes logical reasoning,and logical self-consistency within its system,whose idealistic and universal legal system construction tends to risk separating from social reality,while practical moralism stresses the practicality of laws and the role of moral education,but to some extent,it can’t make the law completely separate from other factors.One-sided construction is full of limitations.Facing the one-sided binary antinomy,coexistence,interaction and struggle of multiple sides can preferably reflect the social reality.
作者
任广浩
王东阳
Ren Guanghao;Wang Dongyang(School of Law and Public Administration,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050024,China)
出处
《洛阳师范学院学报》
2020年第10期93-97,共5页
Journal of Luoyang Normal University