期刊文献+

交易成本视角下产教融合平台治理研究 被引量:11

Research on the Management of Industry-Education Integration Platform from the Perspective of Tansaction Cost
原文传递
导出
摘要 产教融合平台实现了多主体知识、技术、管理、资本等异质性资源的整合利用,然而平台不可避免地存在制度性交易成本,影响协同创新效应。本文运用威廉姆森交易成本理论,结合"校企云"产教融合平台案例,分析了平台交易成本的构成,揭示了产教融合项目资产专用性、不确定性、交易频率与治理方式之间的对应关系,强调产教融合平台需要在资产专用性、不确定性、交易频率三个维度基础上,适应网络创新组织的属性要求,拓展任务复杂性和团队合作质量两个维度。最后基于五个维度,探讨交易成本视角下产教融合平台治理的关键路径。 Industry-education integration platform integrates heterogeneous resources such as multi-agent knowledge,technology,management,and capital.However,there are unavoidably institutional transaction costs on the platform,which affects the collaborative innovation effect.Adopting Williamson’s transaction cost theory and grounded on the case of the"school-enterprise cloud"industry-education integration platform,this paper analyzes the composition of the platform’s transaction costs,revealing the relations between asset specificity,uncertainty,transaction frequency and management methods.It is emphasized that in addition to emphasizing those three factors of asset specificity,uncertainty,and transaction frequency,the industry-education platform also needs to adapt to the attributes of network innovation organizations and expand the two aspects of task complexity and teamwork quality to discuss the key governance path of industry-education integration platform from the perspective of transaction costs.
作者 李玉倩 陈万明 蔡瑞林 Li Yuqian;Chen Wanming;Cai Ruilin
出处 《高等工程教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期71-77,共7页 Research in Higher Education of Engineering
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“从单一走向协同:面向新工科的集成化产教融合平台构建研究”(18YJC880047) 江苏省社科应用研究精品工程课题“多元协同推进江苏产教融合高质量发展策略研究”(20SYA-022)。
关键词 产教融合 交易成本 治理方式 网络治理 industry-education integration transaction cost governance method network governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献47

  • 1文庭孝,罗贤春,刘晓英.电子政务信息资源共享本质及其动力机制研究[J].图书情报知识,2008,25(2):5-9. 被引量:19
  • 2钱颖一.企业的治理结构改革和融资结构改革[J].经济研究,1995,30(1):20-29. 被引量:267
  • 3张维迎.所有制、治理结构及委托—代理关系———兼评崔之元和周其仁的一些观点[J].经济研究,1996,31(9):3-15. 被引量:1551
  • 4Zheng L, Yang T M, Pardo T A, et al. Understanding the " Boundary" in Information Sharing and Integration[ C]. The 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Science,2009:1-10.
  • 5Barki H, Pinsonneault A. A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort and Performance [ J ]. Organization Sci- ence, 2005,16(2) :165-179.
  • 6Gil-Garcia J R, Soon Ae C,Janssen M. Government Information Sharing and Integration: Combining the social and the technical [ J ]. The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 2009,14 ( 1/2 ) : 1 - 10.
  • 7Pardo T A, Tayi G K. Interorganizational Information Integra- tion: A Key Enabler for Digital Government [ J ]. Government information Quarterly, 2007,24 (4) :691-715.
  • 8Phillips, Lawrence, T. B, Hardy. Inter-organi- zational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields [ C ]. Journal of Management Studies, 2000. 37 (1) :23 -44.
  • 9Siegel, D. & Link, A. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of u- niversity technology transfer offices: an exploratory study [J]. Research Policy, 2003.32(1):27 -48.
  • 10Barnes, T Gibbons, A. Effective university-indus- try interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects[J]. European Management Journal, 2002,20 ( 3 ) :272 - 285.

共引文献108

同被引文献148

引证文献11

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部