5Kalle Juuti et al.. Science Teaching Methods Preferred by Grade 9 Students in Finland [J]. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2010 (8): 611-632.
6Haussler P, Hoffman L. A Curricular Frame for Physics Education: Development Comparison with Students' Interest, and Impact on Students' achieve ment and Self-concept [ J ]. Science Education, 2000, 84 (6), 689-705.
7Koballa T R J, (;lynn S M. Attitudinal and Motivational Constructs in Science Learning [A]. S K Abell, N G Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education [C]. Mahwah.- Law- rence Erlbaum, 2007.
8Hidi S, Renninger K A. The Four-phase Model of Interest Development[J].Educational Psycholo- gist, 2006, 4 (2), 111-127.
9Oser F K, Baeriswyl F J. Choreographies of Teaching: Bridging Instruction to Learning [A]. V Richardson. (Ed.), AERA' s Handbook of Research on Teaching [C]. (4th ed. ) Washington.. American Educational Research Association. 2001 (4th ed. ) : 1031-1065.
10University of Oslo. The Relevance of Science Education [ EB/OL ]. http: //roseproject. no/2011- 01-24.