摘要
基于工具理性设计的社会养老模式,客观上导致了老人意外风险在社会养老系统中的再分配,并由此产生了新的制度性风险,意外风险治理出现偏离工具理性的复杂局面。从风险社会理论出发,以济南为例,通过研究老人意外风险治理实践发现,风险治理存在归责逻辑的冲突、家庭关系与治理效率的背反、社区与服务机构的责任纠缠、服务机构应对之策的内卷化等困境。对于防治意外风险并消除上述困境,社区具有政策、社会支持、风险要素整体控制、社会养老文化建设等多维优势,以社区为基础的社会养老意外风险治理是一种可行选择。
The social endowment mode based on the design of instrumental rationality objectively leads to the redistribution of the elderly accident risk in the social endowment system,and thus produces new institutional risks and the complex situation of risk governance deviating from instrumental rationality.Based on the risk society theory and taking Jinan as an example,this paper studies the elderly accident risk governance practices and finds out that there are some difficulties in the risk governance such as imputation logic conflict,conflict between family relationship and governance efficiency,responsibility entanglement between communities and service institutions,involution of service institutions'countermeasure.The community has several advantages in preventing the accident risk and solving the above problems,such as policy,social support,overall control of risk factors and construction of social endowment culture.Accident risk governance of social endowment based on community is a viable option.
出处
《常州大学学报(社会科学版)》
2020年第5期72-78,共7页
Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金
山东省社会科学规划青年学者重点培养计划研究专项“山东城市社区健康养老体系建设研究”(18CQXJ19)。
关键词
风险社会
社会养老
意外风险
社区治理
risk society
social endowment
accident risk
community governance