期刊文献+

罗哌卡因头皮神经阻滞对脑膜瘤切除术患者术后康复质量的影响 被引量:13

Effect of ropivacaine scalp nerve block on the quality of recovery after meningioma resection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨罗哌卡因行头皮神经阻滞对脑膜瘤切除术后患者康复质量的影响。方法择期全身麻醉下行脑膜瘤切除术患者122例,男29例,女93例,年龄28~74岁,BMI 18~28 kg/m^2,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,随机分为两组:罗哌卡因头皮神经阻滞组(R组,n=64)和生理盐水对照组(S组,n=58)。R组的患者在全麻诱导后头架安装前15 min以0.5%罗哌卡因15~20 ml行眶上、滑车上、耳颞、枕大和枕小神经阻滞,S组用等量生理盐水予以注射。两组均行气管插管全身麻醉。记录术中麻醉药物;术前、术后第3天和出院前患者KPS评分;术后第1、2、3天VAS疼痛评分;麻醉满意度,术后3d帕瑞昔布钠使用总量,住院时间。结果与S组比较,R组术中丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼、顺式阿曲库铵用量明显减少(P<0.05)。与术前比较,术后第3天两组KPS评分明显降低(P<0.05),出院前两组KPS评分明显升高(P<0.05);术后第3天R组KPS评分明显高于S组(P<0.05)。术后第1、2、3天R组VAS疼痛评分均明显低于S组(P<0.05)。R组麻醉满意度评分明显高于S组(P<0.05)。术后3 d内R组帕瑞昔布钠使用率明显低于S组(P<0.05)。两组住院时间差异无统计学意义。结论罗哌卡因头皮神经阻滞能提高患者麻醉满意度评分,降低患者术后疼痛,对患者术后早期康复质量有一定改善作用。 Objective To explore the effect of ropivacaine scalp nerve block on the quality of rehabilitation in patients undergoing meningioma resection.Methods A total of 122 patients scheduled for meningioma resection undergoing general anesthesia,29 males and 93 females,aged 28-74 years,BMI 18-28 kg/m^2,ASA physical statusⅠorⅡ,were randomly divided into ropivacaine scalp nerve block group(group R,n=64)and normal saline control group(group S,n=58).In group R,supraorbital,supra-spindle,auricular,greater occipital,and lesser occipital nerve blocks were performed with 15-20 ml of 0.5%ropivacaine after induction of anesthesia and 15 min before erection of head rack.In group S,equal amount of normal saline was injected.General anesthesia were used in both groups.the amount of anesthetic during the surgery,KPS score before and the third day after surgery and at discharge,Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)at 1st,2nd and 3rd d after surgery,satisfaction of anesthesia,total amount of parecoxib sodium used 3 d after surgery,Length of hospital stay were recorded.Results Compared with group S,the amount of propofol,remifentanil and cisatracurium in group R was significantly reduced(P<0.05).Compared with the preoperative,the KPS scores of the two groups were significantly reduced at the 3rd d after surgery(P<0.05),and the KPS scores of the two groups were significantly increased before the discharge(P<0.05);At the 3rd d after surgery,the KPS score of group R was significantly higher than that of group S(P<0.05).The VAS pain scores of group R were significantly lower than those of group S at 1st,2nd and 3rd d after surgery(P<0.05).Satisfaction of anesthesia in group R was significantly higher than that in group S.The use of parecoxib sodium in group R was significantly lower than that in group S within 3 d after surgery(P<0.05).There was no statistically difference in length of stay between the two groups.Conclusion The scalp nerve block can improve the patient’s score of anesthesia satisfaction,reduce the patient’s postoperative pain,and improve the quality of short-term postoperative recovery.
作者 邹巧群 舒慧刚 吴彤 高卫真 苏殿三 俞卫锋 田婕 ZOU Qiaoqun;SHU Huigang;WU Tong;GAO Weizhen;SU Diansan;YU Weifeng;TIAN Jie(Department of Anesthesiology,Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200127,China)
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第9期866-870,共5页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
基金 上海市浦东新区卫健委联合攻关项目(PW2016D-4) 仁济医院临床科研创新培育基金计划(PYMDT-006) 上海申康医院发展中心临床科技创新项目(SHDC12017X11)。
关键词 头皮神经阻滞 罗哌卡因 脑膜瘤切除术 KPS评分 术后康复质量 Scalp nerve block Ropivacaine Meningioma resection Karnofsky performance status score Postoperative recovery quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1王立新,王保国.头皮神经阻滞联合芬太尼降低切皮时交感神经反应的最低肺泡有效浓度[J].中国康复理论与实践,2005,11(5):388-389. 被引量:5
  • 2吴新民,岳云,张利萍,王俊科,艾登滨,于布为,薛张纲,黄文起.术后镇痛中帕瑞昔布钠对吗啡用量的节俭作用和安全性—前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组研究[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(1):7-10. 被引量:367
  • 3Tuchinda L,Somboonviboon W,Supbomsug K,et al.Bupivacainescalp nerve block;hemodynamic response during craniotomy,intraop-erative and post-operative analgesia[J].Asian Biomed,2010,4(2).
  • 4Tubbs R S,Salter E G,Wellons J C,et al.Landmarks for the identi-fication of the cutaneous nerves of the occiput and nuchal regions[J].Clinical Anatomy,2007,20(3):235-238.
  • 5Papangelou A,Radzik B R,Smith T,et al.A review of scalp block-ade for cranial surgery[J].Journal of clinical anesthesia,2013,25(2):150-159.
  • 6Andersen N B,Bovim G,Sjaastad O.The frontotemporal peripheralnerves.Topographic variations of the supraorbital,supratrochlear and auriculotemporal nerves and their possible clinical significance[J].Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy,2001,23(2);97-104.
  • 7Jeong SM,Park KJ,Kang SH,et al.Anatomical consideration of theanterior and lateral cutaneous nerves in the scalp[J].Journal of Kore-an medical science,2010,25(4):517-522.
  • 8Ohmura S,Kawada M,Ohta T,et al.Systemic toxicity and resuscita-tion in bupivacaine-,levobupivacaine-,or ropivacaine-infused rats[J].Anesthesia & Analgesia,2001,93(3):743-748.
  • 9Graf B M,Abraham I,Eberbach N,et al.Differences in cardiotoxicity of bupivacaine and ropivacaine are the result of physicochemical and stereos-elective properties[J].Anesthesiology,2002,96(6):1427-1434.
  • 10Costello T G,Cormack J R,Hoy C,et al.Plasma ropivacaine levels following scalp block for awake craniotomy[J].Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology,2004,16(2):147-150.

共引文献15

同被引文献121

引证文献13

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部