期刊文献+

法治社会建设中的公正观培育 被引量:1

Cultivation of the View of Justice in the Social Construction Ruled by Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公正是法治社会的根本特征和建设目标。实质上,公正作为个体价值观,是一个人在以人为本的前提下,基于平等、正义原则,对个体或群体的“应得”所进行的理解、判断、评价和选择。法治社会的公正观,以平等为前提,以个人幸福和社会正义为目标,具有超越正义的互利性和超越理想的实践性。个体公正观是在自主内化机制、环境浸润、专业教导三者交织中建构起来的。法治社会建设中的公正观培育,需要立足于人、行为和环境交互作用的社会场域,以对社会场域中“情本体”的超越为前提,采取将群体内置于个体的路径,激活个体的社会认同机制,促进自主建构。 Justice is the fundamental feature and construction goal of a society ruled by law.In essence,the view of justice is one’s understanding,judgment,evaluation and choice of“the deserved”of an individual or a group based on the principle of equality and justice,and under the premise of people foremost.The principle of justice in a society ruled by law takes equality as the premise,personal happiness and social justice as the goal,and it is mutually beneficial beyond justice and practical beyond ideals.The view of individual justice is constructed in the interweaving of independent internalization mechanism,environmental immersion and professional teaching.The cultivation of justice in the construction of a society under the rule of law needs to be based on the social field where humans,behavior and environment interact,and on the premise of transcending the“emotion ontology”in the social field;it should take the path of placing the group into the individual,activate the social identity mechanism of children,and promote the independent construction.
作者 郑航 秦楠 ZHENG Hang;QIN Nan
出处 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期127-137,191,共12页 Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学一般项目“法治社会建设中青少年的社会认同与公正观培育研究”(BEA180117)。
关键词 公正观 法治社会 社会场域 个人-群体关系 view of justice society ruled by law social field individual-group relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献11

  • 1胡金生,叶春,李旭,高婷婷.公正判断中的“非理性”:加工特征、主要表现和影响因素.心理科学进展,2005,18(4),623-629.
  • 2Oosterbeek, Hessel, Randolph Sloof and Gijs van de Kuilen (2004). Cultural Differences in Ultima- tum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis. Experimental Economics, 7, 171 - 188.
  • 3Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010). The justice sensitivity inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. So- cial Justice Research, 23, 211-238.
  • 4Baumert, A., & Schmitt, M. (2009). Jus- tice-sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61 (1), 6 - 12.
  • 5Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J. & Baer, A. (2005). Asymmetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on pro-social and antisocial behavior. Social Justice Research, 18, 183-201.
  • 6Hafer C. L, Begue L., Choma B. L., et al. (2005).Belief in a just world and commitment to long-term deserved outcomes. Social Justice Re- search, 18(4): 429-444.
  • 7Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2006). Inequality and happiness: Insights from Latin America. Journal of Economic Inequality, 4,107-122.
  • 8Sanfey, A. G., R.illing, J. K., Aronson J A , Nystrom L E, Cohen J D (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300,1755-1758.
  • 9Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty J P, Stephan K E, Dolan R J, Frith C D (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fair- ness of others. Nature,439:466-469.
  • 10吴胜涛,王力,周明洁,王文忠,张建新.灾区民众的公正观与幸福感及其与非灾区的比较[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(3):579-587. 被引量:40

共引文献4

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部