摘要
孔子与苏格拉底的“对话术”被认为是“启发式教学”的两个源头,他们的教学内容与方式存在着极大的不同,对后世的影响也有显著的区别。学术界的研究虽然已经取得了相当多的共识,但是对以孔子为代表的中国传统“启发式”的实施方式这个关键问题缺乏追究,而一些学者对于苏格拉底“产婆术”关键步骤的意义缺乏认识,导致对两者的价值判断失衡,也对于当今的“启发式教学”内涵认识不足。本文在这两个方面做了补充和探索。
The"dialogism"of Confucius and Socrates is considered as the two sources of"heuristic teaching".There are great differences in their teaching contents and methods,and their influence on later generations is also significant.Although there has been a lot of consensus in academic research,there is a lack of investigation on the key problem of the implementation of traditional Chinese"heuristic"represented by Confucius,and some scholars lack understanding of the significance of the key steps of Socrates′midwifery,which leads to the imbalance of value judgment and the lack of understanding of the connotation of"heuristic teaching"today.This paper makes supplement and exploration in these two aspects.
作者
黄宾主
张卫兵
HUANG Bin-zhu;ZHANG Wei-bing(School of Arts,Hubei Normal University,Huangshi 435002,China)
出处
《湖北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2020年第5期119-123,共5页
Journal of Hubei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词
启发式
孔子
苏格拉底
教学方法
提问法
heuristic
Confucius
Socrates
teaching method
questioning method