期刊文献+

联合使用德尔菲法与层次分析法构建精神科护理人员能力评价指标的研究 被引量:7

Study on the combination of Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process to construct the competency evaluation index of psychiatric nursing staff
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨德尔菲法和层次分析法联合应用在精神科护理人员能力评价指标体系建立中的效果。方法使用研究工作组自行设计的问卷,对北京市范围内直接或间接从事精神科护理工作的23名专家进行德尔菲专家咨询,利用层次分析法计算各个指标的权重,建立精神科护理工作人员核心能力评价指标体系。结果专家两轮的权威系数分别为0.848、0.888,两轮咨询的专家意见协调系数具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。形成精神科护理工作人员能力评价指标体系包括5条一级指标,15条二级指标,64条三级指标,全部指标的重要性评分分布在3.12~4.97分。结论通过依次使用德尔菲法和层次分析法建立精神科护理人员工作能力评价指标,具有充分的科学性,符合该项工作发展的要求,但尚需要更大规模的从业人员进行深入验证。 Objective To explore the effect of using Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process to construct the competency evaluation index of psychiatric nursing staff.Methods Using the questionnaire designed by the research team,the Delphi expert consultation was conducted on 23 experts who directly or indirectly engaged in psychiatric nursing work in Beijing.The weight of each index was calculated by analytic hierarchy process,and the evaluation index system of core competence of psychiatric nursing staff was established.Results The authority coefficient of the two rounds of consultation was 0.848 and 0.888 respectively,and the coordination coefficient of expert opinions in the two rounds of consultation was statistically significant(P<0.05).The competency evaluation index system of psychiatric nursing staff includes 5 first-class indicators,15 second-class indicators and 64 third-class indicators.The importance score of all the indicators ranges from 3.12 to 4.97.Conclusion It is scientific enough to use Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process successively to establish working competence evaluation index of psychiatric nursing staff,which is in line with the requirements of the development of this work.However,it still needs to be further verified by practitioners on a larger scale.
作者 韩伟 刘敏 李朝晖 HAN Wei;LIU Min;LI Zhaohui(Xinkang Hospital of Beijing Daxing District,Beijing 102600,China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2020年第29期118-120,共3页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 德尔菲法 层次分析法 精神科 专家咨询 Delphi method analytic hierarchy process psychiatry department expert consultation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献150

共引文献201

同被引文献101

引证文献7

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部