期刊文献+

国际比较视野下的中国烟草诉讼研究

Research on China’s Tobacco Litigation under International Comparative View
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着对烟草危害性认识的深入以及各国政府对国民健康的关注,烟草控制已经成为一个世界性的话题,通过法律途径来控制烟草,日渐成为当前各国的普遍做法,通过烟草诉讼来对烟草的受害人进行权利救济,保障公众健康权,被认为是"潜在的控制烟草销售和使用的最有效手段之一"。美国、澳大利亚等国家的实践证明了烟草诉讼对控烟的有效性,以及在引发人们对烟草危害的认识,推动卫生政策执行和完善上的积极作用。但烟草诉讼在中国还非常鲜见,目前烟草诉讼无论在理论还是实践上都未引起人们的足够重视,其推进受到诉讼制度内外的双重制约。通过对烟草诉讼理论和实践的国际比较研究,对我国烟草诉讼的可行路径进行了探索。 As the awareness on the harm of the tobacco gets deeper and the governments of many countries draw more attention on their citizen’s health,tobacco control has become a global topic.To control tobacco through legal approaches has gradually become a common practice by every country.Tobacco lawsuits,by providing right relief to injured smokers and thus ensuring public health rights,are deemed as one of the most effective measures to control sales and usage of tobacco in a potential manner.The practice in countries,such as USA and Australia,has well proved tobacco lawsuits have played an active role in promoting tobacco control,initiating people’s awareness on tobacco’s hazards and pushing forward the implementation and improvement of health policy.However,it is very rare in China to promote tobacco control through litigation.Presently,tobacco lawsuits have not drawn sufficient attention neither in theory nor in practice and are hard to make progress because of limitation within and out of judicial system.The author attempts to probe into feasible approaches in China’s tobacco lawsuits through investigations in theories and practice of tobacco lawsuits.
作者 闫翠翠 YAN Cui-cui(Literature Development Dept.ofLibrary and Cultural Center,CCPS,Beijing 100091,China)
出处 《天津法学》 2020年第3期73-79,共7页 Tianjin Legal Science
关键词 烟草诉讼 控烟 健康权 挑战 对策 tobacco litigation tobacco control right to health challenge countermeasures
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献33

  • 1朱岩.《论民法典中的一般条款》[J].月旦民商法,2005,(2).
  • 2[3]17岁少年烟草诉讼被终审裁定驳回[N] .中国青年报,2001-09-15.
  • 3[4]张卫.举证责任倒置问题研究[N] .人民法院报,2001-09-26.
  • 4[5]张新宝,李玲.共同侵权的法理探讨[N] .人民法院报,2001-11-09.
  • 5[1]美国烟草诉讼案上诉程序路漫漫[N] .中华工商时报,2000-07-18.
  • 6[2]烟草官司大事记[N] .国际金融报,2000-08-02.
  • 7谷口安平著 王亚新 刘荣军译.《程序的正义与诉讼》[M].中国政法大学出版,1996年..
  • 8章武生.民事诉讼法新论[M].北京:法律出版社,2002..
  • 9详见《消费者权益保护法》第49条,中国人民银行、教育部、财政部《关于助学贷款管理的若干意见》第二条第(十二)项.
  • 10Jack B. Weinstein, "Ethical Dilemmas in Mass Tort Litigation," 88 Nw. U. L. Rev. 469, (11994) at 510 n.164.

共引文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部