产科护理干预对胎膜早破产妇的临床效果

Clinical Effect of Obstetric Nursing Intervention on Parturient with PROM

目的了解产科护理干预对胎膜早破产妇的临床效果。方法于2016年10月至2018年10月在本院中针对产科胎膜早破产妇按照病情诊断共筛选200例病患,将其分成两组方便对比,两组分别为开展常规护理指导的常规护理干预组(n=100)与在常规护理基础上开展产科护理的产科护理干预组(n=100),对两组的护理成效进行观察与评估。结果组间新生儿难产率和窒息率比较结果:产科护理干预组的生产结局优于常规护理干预组,比较统计差值时P<0.05有意义;产妇临床护理满意度比较:常规护理干预组的总满意度为85.00%,明显低于产科护理干预组(97.00%)。组间护理满意度比较P<0.05有统计学意义。结论用产科临床护理方法减少产妇在生产过程中容易出现的胎膜早破致使其难产和新生儿窒息问题的效果优秀,避免不良结局发生并提升胎膜早破产妇的护理满意度,值得推荐。

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of obstetric nursing intervention on premature rupture of membranes in pregnant women.Methods October 2016 to October 2018 in our hospital for premature rupture of membranes obstetrical maternal according to diagnosis screening of 200 cases of patients,it is divided into two groups of convenient contrast,two groups respectively to carry out the routine nursing instruction of routine nursing intervention group(n=100)and obstetric nursing intervention group that develops obstetric nursing based on routine nursing(n=100),observation and evaluation the nursing effect of two groups.Result Comparison results of neonatal dystocia rate and asphyxia rate between groups:the obstetric nursing intervention group had better birth outcomes than the conventional care intervention group,and the statistical difference was significant at P<0.05.Comparison of maternal clinical nursing satisfaction:the total satisfaction of the conventional nursing intervention group was 85.00%,significantly lower than that of the obstetric nursing intervention group(97.00%).Comparison of nursing satisfaction between groups P<0.05 was statistically significant.Conclusion It is worthy of recommendation to use clinical obstetric nursing methods to reduce the premature rupture of membranes that is prone to occur in the process of childbirth,resulting in dystocia and neonatal asphyxia,to avoid adverse outcomes and improve the nursing satisfaction of premature rupture of membranes.