期刊文献+

血常规及T淋巴细胞亚群在新型冠状病毒肺炎病程监测中的意义 被引量:7

Significance of blood routine and T lymphocyte subsets monitoring in course of coronavirus disease 2019
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 观察新型冠状病毒肺炎(简称新冠肺炎)患者病程中外周血T淋巴细胞、血常规指标的变化情况,探讨其监测的意义.方法 2020年1月26日至3月2日,昆明市第三人民医院共收治确诊的新冠肺炎患者27例,其中重症组10例,轻症组17例.收集患者病程(7±1)、(10±1)、(14±1)、(20±1)d外周血T淋巴细胞亚群、白细胞计数(WBC)及分类计数等临床资料,观察两组不同时间点实验室指标的变化趋势;采用Spearmen相关性分析法分析发生重症时间与淋巴细胞计数(LYM)的相关性.结果 重症组新冠肺炎患者入院时LYM、嗜酸粒细胞计数(Eos)及CD3^+、CD4^+、CD8^+T淋巴细胞计数均明显低于轻症组〔LYM(×10^9/L):0.96±0.30比1.47±0.39,Eos(×10^9/L):0.006±0.001比0.051±0.004,CD3^+(个/μL):685.59±254.73比1084.31±306.66,CD4^+(个/μL):393.25±166.31比644.00±230.95,CD8^+(个/μL):251.08±112.28比389.94±118.52,均P<0.05〕.随病程进展,两组中性粒细胞计数(NEU)呈上升趋势,重症组于病程(14±1)d达峰值,且NEU明显高于轻症组(×10^9/L:6.96±4.29比3.24±1.12),随后两组呈迅速下降趋势;轻症组Eos呈上升趋势,于(20±1)d达峰值;重症组Eos于(10±1)d达谷值,且明显低于轻症组(×10^9/L:0.006±0.001比0.059±0.004,P<0.05),此后逐渐升高;LYM、CD3^+、CD4^+、CD8^+均于病程(10±1)d时达谷值,且重症组明显低于轻症组〔LYM(×10^9/L):0.78±0.30比1.44±0.48,CD3^+(个/μL):539.00±280.46比927.70±291.42,CD4^+(个/μL):299.29±146.38比539.00±189.49,CD8^+(个/μL):201.29±106.44比352.90±136.40,均P<0.05〕,此后开始升高,LYM、CD3^+、CD8^+于病程(20±1)d达峰值,重症组LYM、CD3^+仍低于轻症组〔LYM(×10^9/L):1.25±0.27比1.63±0.63,CD3^+(个/μL):1067.43±303.36比1107.70±413.25〕,CD8^+略高于轻症组(个/μL:421.29±194.70比400.70±179.98).相关性分析显示,发生重症时间与LYM呈显著负相关性(r=-0.754,P=0.012).结论 监测新冠肺炎患者病程(10±1)-(14±1)d的NEU对评估病情有一定的帮助,监测病程(10±1)d的Eos及CD3^+、CD4^+、CD8^+T淋巴细胞计数对病情评估有较高的价值,监测病程(10±1)d的LYM水平对重症患者病情预警有较高价值. Objective To observe the changes of peripheral blood T lymphoeytes subsets and blood routine indexes in the course of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19),and explore the significance of monitoring the above changes.Methods The 27 patients with confirmed diagnosis of C0VID-19 in the Third People's Hospial of Kunming during January 26 to March 2,2020 were selected as research objeets,and they were divided into a severe group(10 cases)and a mild group(17 cases)according to the difference in disease severity degree.The clinical data such as T lymphoeyte subsets,white blood cell count(WBC)and its lasification in peripheral blood of patients with COVID-19 were ollected on the following days in the disease course(7±1),(10±1).(14±1)and(20±1)days in hospital to observe the laboratory indexes changing trends at above various time points in two groups;Spearman correlation analysis method was used to analyze the correlation between the oceurrence time of severe ilness and lymphocyte count (LYM),Results The LYM,eosinophil count(Eos)and CD3^+,CD4^+and CD8^+ T lymphocyte counts at admission in severe COVID-19 patient group were significantly lower than those in mild group[LYM(×10^9/L):0.96+0.30 vs.1.47±0.39,Eos(×10^9/L):0.006±0.009 vs.0.051±0.044,CD3^+(cells/μL):685.59±254.73 vs.1084.31±306.66,CD4^+(cells/μL):393.25±166.31 vs.644.00±230.95.CD8^+(cells/μL);251.08±112.28 vs.389.94±118.52.all P<0.05].With the progression of disease,the neutrophil count(NEU)of two groups showed an upward trend,in the severe group,the NEU level reached the peak value on(14±1)days of disease course,and the NEU count was higher than that in mild group(×10^9/L:6.96±4.29 vs.3.24±1.12).then afterward the two groups showed rapid downward trend in two groups;Eos in the mild group showed an upward trend and reached the peak on(20±1)day;in the severe group,Eos reached the valley value on(10±1)day,which was significantly lower than that in the mild group(×10^9/L:0.006±0.001 vs.0.059±0.004,P<0.05),and then gradually increased;the levels of LYM,CD3^+.CD4^+.and CD8^+ reached the valley value on(10±1)day of the disease course in both groups,and the above indexes in severe group was significantly lower than those in the mild group[LYM(×10^9/L):0.78±0.30 vs.1.44±0.48,CD3^+(celIs/μL):539.00±280.46 vs.927.70±291.42.CD4^+(celIs/μL):299.29±146.38 vs.539.00±189.49.CD8^+(celIs/μL);201.29±106.44 vs.352.90±136.40,all P<0.05].Afterwards,the indexes began to increase and LYM,CD3^+.CD8^+ reached the peak value on day(20±1)of disease course,LYM and CD3^+ were still lower in severe group than those in mild group[LYM(×10^9/L):1.25+0.27 vs.1.63+0.63,CD3^+(celIs/μL):1067.43±303.36 vs.1107.70±413.25,CD8^+ was slightly higher than that in mild group(celIs/μL:421.29±194.70 vs.400.70±179.98).Correlation analysis showed that the time of occurrence of severe ilness was negatively correlated with LYM(r=-0.754,P=0.012)].Conclusion Monitoring NEU in patients with COVID-19 during(10±1)-(14±1)days in the disease course has certain help for the assessment of disease situation,on(10±1)day in the disease course,monitoring of Eos and CD3^+,CD4^+and CD8^+ T-lymphocyte counts has relatively good value for disease situation assessment,and monitoring of LYM level on(10±1)day of disease course has relatively high value of pre-warming for severe patients with COVID-19.
作者 张乐 刘幸 张艳 白劲松 高建鹏 夏加伟 白彬 范秀英 Zhang le;Liu Xing;Zhang Yan;Bai Jingsong;Gao Jianpeng;Xia Jiawei;Bai Bin;Fan Xiuying(Department of Intensive Care Unit,the Third People's Hospital of Kunming,Kunming 650041,Yunnan,China;Department of Pharmacy,the Third People's Haspital of Kurming,Kunming 650041,Yurnan,China;CDC office,the Third People's Hospital of Kunming,Kunming 650041,Yunnan,China;Hospital Office,the Third People's Hospital of Kunming,Kunming 650041,Yunnan,China)
出处 《中国中西医结合急救杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第5期513-517,共5页 Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care
基金 云南省昆明市新型冠状病毒感染肺炎科技防治项目(2020-1-N-O53)。
关键词 新型冠状病毒肺炎 血常规 T淋巴细胞亚群 病程 Coronavirus disease 2019 Blood routine T lymphoeyte subsets Course of disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献29

  • 1李磊,汤耀卿,毛恩强,秦帅,陈胜,张明钧.急性重症胰腺炎血液滤过治疗的机制[J].世界华人消化杂志,2004,12(12):2822-2825. 被引量:13
  • 2[3]Tsang KW,Ho PL,Ooi GC,et al. A cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong.N Engl Med,2003,348:1977-1985
  • 3Imai M, Watanabe T, Hatta M, Das SC, Ozawa M, Shinya K, Zhong G, Hanson A, Katsura H, Watanabe S, Li C, Kawakami E, Yamada S, Kiso M, Suzuki Y, Maher EA, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y. Experimental adaptation of an influenza H5 HA confers respiratory droplet transmission to a reassortant H5 HA/H1N1 virus in ferrets. Nature, 2012, 486:420-428.
  • 4Herfst S, Schrauwen EJ, Linster M, Chutinimitkul S, de Wit E, Munster V J, Sorrell EM, Bestebroer TM, Burke DF, Smith DJ, Rimmelzwaan GF, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Airborne transmission of influenza A/H5N1 virus between ferrets. Science, 2012, 336:1534-1541.
  • 5Peiris JS, Cheung CY, Leung CY, Nicholls JM. Innate immune responses to influenza A H5NI: friend or foe? Trends Immunol, 2009, 30:574-584.
  • 6Kuba K, Imai Y, Rao S, Gao H, Guo F, Guan B, Huan Y, Yang P, Zhang Y, Deng W, Bao L, Zhang B, Liu G, Wang Z, Chappell M, Liu Y, Zheng D, Leibbrandt A, Wada T, Slutsky AS, Liu D, Qin C, Jiang C, Penninger JM. A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in sars coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat Med, 2005, 11 : 875-879.
  • 7Zou Z, Yan Y, Shu Y, Gao R, Sun Y, Li X, Ju X, Liang Z, Liu Q, Zhao Y, Guo F, Bai T, Han Z, Zhu J, Zhou H, Huang F, Li C, Lu H, Li N, Li D, Jin N, Penninger JM, Jiang C. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from lethal avian influenza A H5N1 infections. Nat Commun, 2014, 5:3594.
  • 8Huang F, Guo J, Zou Z, Liu J, Cao B, Zhang S, Li H, Wang W, Sheng M, Liu S, Pan J, Bao C, Zeng M, Xiao H, Qian G, Hu X, Chen Y, Chert Y, Zhao Y, Liu Q, Zhou H, Zhu J, Gao H, Yang S, Liu X, Zheng S, Yang J, Diao H, Cao H, Wu Y, Zhao M, Tan S, Guo D, Zhao X, Ye Y, Wu W, Xu Y, Penninger JM, Li D, Gao GF, Jiang C, Li L. Angiotensin II plasma levels are linked to disease severity and predict fatal outcomes in H7N9-infected patients. Nat Commun, 2014 5:3595.
  • 9Kim S, lwao H. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of angiotensin II-mediated cardiovascular and renal diseases. Pharmacol Rev, 2000, 52:11-34.
  • 10Robles NR, Cerezo I, Hernandez-Gallego R. Renin-angiotensin system blocking drugs. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther, 2014, 19: 14-33.

共引文献1415

同被引文献97

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部