期刊文献+

“输出驱动-输入多元”教学模式的构建与应用研究——以我国德语基础阶段学习者为研究对象

The Construction and Practice of the “Output-Driven→Multi-Input” Teaching Model——A Study Aimed at Chinese German Learners at the Basic Stage
原文传递
导出
摘要 该研究从当下德语基础阶段的实际情况出发,结合德国交际教学法学者皮福的交际能力理论、输出重构理论和克拉申的输入假设理论,构建了"输出驱动-输入多元"教学模式,并结合定量研究和定性研究从学习者输出语言的流利性、准确性和复杂性三大维度对该教学模式的语言输出能力培养效果进行对比实验和数据分析。文章在对德语教学方式进行探究和改良的基础上,提出德语基础阶段课程优化的四项原则:(1)任务载体和强烈语用动机奠定长效起点基石;(2)输出驱动、输入多元并举构建有效教学手段;(3)系列学科人文创新活动助力课程的坚实支撑;(4)综合素养平衡发展集成学习者最终培养方向。 This study started from the current situation concerning the basic stage of German study in China. Based on the communicative competence theories,especially the output reconstruction theory of the German communicative pedagogical scholar HansEberhard Piepho and Stephen Krashen’s input hypothesis,this research illustrated the construction of"Output-Driven → Multi-Input" model in terms of the operating procedures and main principles in teaching German as a foreign language. The model aimed to improve Chinese students ’ competence of oral communication through the advocacy of output-driven learning methods,the emphasis of multiple inputs and the development of a series of characteristic activities related to the curriculum. In daily teaching practice,teachers should emphasize both form and meaning,the language scaffolding for learners,and more practice. This research also discussed how these methods can be employed to optimize the German curriculum.To provide practical support for the construction of the teaching model,this study conducted a comparative experiment and provided in-depth quantitative and qualitative data analysis of the language output training effect of the teaching model from three dimensions,i. e.fluency,accuracy and complexity of the learners’ output language. The result showed that the "Output-Driven →Multi-Input"model had obvious advantages.The research combined theoretical and practical verifications,improved the German teaching method,and initially constructed an easy-to-operate teaching model for German study at the basic stage in China. The results of the experiment supported the effect of the model with visible measurements. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses proved that the model was not only rational,but also effective and beneficial to modern foreign language teaching. A virtuous circle with strong learning motivation,harmonious teacher-student interaction and remarkable teaching achievements were greatly emphasized during the research process.At the end of the paper,four fundamental principles of optimizing German courses were proposed:( 1) The tasks as carrier of this model,together with the strong pragmatic motivation of the students, should act as a starting point for successful German lessons in the long term.( 2) Output and multi-input should be promoted in parallel, which constitutes the most effective teaching method.( 3) As a solid support for the German course,a series of activities should be innovated in different ways,which help to optimize the curriculum.( 4) The balanced development of comprehensive competencies should become the ultimate educational goal for German learners.These four items can serve as reference for the development of German Curriculum at the basic stage.
作者 陈壮鹰 宋洋 CHEN Zhuang-ying;SONG Yang(School of German Studies,Shanghai International Studies University,Shanghai 200083,China;Shanghai Cao Yang No.2 High School,Shanghai 200062,China)
出处 《外语电化教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第4期11-11,65-72,81,共10页 Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education
关键词 基础阶段 输出驱动 输入多元 教学模式 课程优化 Basic Stage Output-Driven Multi-Input Teaching Model Curriculum Optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1王策三.论教师的主导作用和学生的主体地位[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1983(6):70-76. 被引量:142
  • 2黄月圆,顾曰国.以学生为中心,多维一体的大学英语教学法[J].外语教学与研究,1996,28(2):9-13. 被引量:103
  • 3杨忠.培养技能 发展智能——外语教育工具性与人文性的统一[J].外语学刊,2007(6):133-137. 被引量:95
  • 4Larsen-Freeman, D. 2005. Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring [M~. Bos- ton, MA:. Thomson Heinle.
  • 5Collins, J. & N. O'Brien (eds.). 2003. Greenwood Dictionary of Education ~-Z~. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • 6Hanten, G., X. Li, S. Chapman, P. Swank, J. Gamino, G. Roberson&H. Levin. 2007. De- velopment of verbal selective learning [J]. Developmental Neuropsychology 32 (1). 585-596.
  • 7Kirschner, P., J. Sweller & R. Clark. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, expe- riential, and inquiry-based teaching [J]. Educational Psychologist 4(2) : 75-86.
  • 8Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications I-M3. London: Longman.
  • 9Long, M. 1983. Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of com- prehensible input [J]. Applied Linguistics 4:126-141.
  • 10Long, M. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition I-A3. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C3. SanDiego: Academic Press. 413-468.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部