期刊文献+

剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠术中出血的危险因素 被引量:6

Analysis of risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage of cesarean scar pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨影响剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠(CSP)术中出血的相关危险因素。方法回顾性分析2013年1月~2019年1月于南充市中心医院及武汉市妇幼保健院接受手术治疗的410例CSP患者的临床资料,根据术中出血量,分为出血组67例和对照组343例,通过卡方检验或t检验比较出血组和对照组CSP患者的临床特征,采用多因素二分类Logistic回归分析可能影响CSP患者术中出血的可能因素,并绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线对危险因素进行评估。结果出血组与对照组单因素分析表明年龄、CSP病灶清除手术方式、停经天数、妊娠囊最大直径及CSP分型差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),将有统计学意义的因素纳入多因素logistic回归分析显示CSP病灶清除手术方式、妊娠囊最大直径和CSP分型是CSP术中出血的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC分析结果为妊娠囊最大直径、CSP分型及CSP病灶清除手术方式曲线下面积分别为0.77(95%CI=0.713-0.827,P<0.001)、0.75(95%CI=0.686-0.815,P<0.001)和0.438(95%CI=0.273-0.423,P<0.001),妊娠囊最大直径最佳临界值为3cm,灵敏度85.2%,特异度69.1%。结论CSP术中出血受CSP病灶清除手术方式、妊娠囊最大直径及CSP分型影响,妊娠囊直径>3cm和CSPⅢ型是术中出血的高危因素。 Objective To explore the influence of cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP)correlative risk factors of intraoperative blood loss.Methods The clinical data of 410 patients with CSP who received surgical treatment in Nanchong Central Hospital and Wuhan maternal and child health care hospital from January 2013 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the amount of intraoperative blood loss,they were divided into bleeding group(67 cases)and control group(343 cases).The clinical characteristics of CSP patients in the bleeding group and the control group were compared.Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to analyze the possible factors that may affect the intraoperative bleeding in CSP patients,and the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was drawn to evaluate the risk factors.Results Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in age,CSP focus clearance operation mode,menopause days,gestational sac maximum diameter and CSP classification between bleeding group and control group(P<0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the surgical method,the largest diameter of gestational sac and the classification of CSP were the independent risk factors of hemorrhage during CSP operation(P<0.05).ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve of the largest diameter of gestational sac,classification of CSP and surgical method of CSP lesion removal were 0.77(95%CI=0.713-0.827,P<0.001),0.75(95%CI=0.686-0.815,P<0.001)and 0.438(95%CI=0.273-0.423,P<0.001),respectively.The best cut-off value of the largest diameter of gestational sac was 3 cm,the sensitivity was 85.2%,and the specificity was 69.1%.Conclusion The bleeding during CSP operation was affected by the operation mode of CSP focus clearance,the maximum diameter of gestational sac and the classification of CSP.Gestational sac diameter>3 cm and CSP typeⅢwere the high risk factors of intraoperative hemorrhage.
作者 林单 孟婵 胡辉权 蔡鑫 汤亚兰 邓利虹 徐凡 沈锐 LIN Dan;MENG Chan;HU Huiquan;CAI Xin;TANG Yalang;DENG Lihong;XU Fan;SHEN Rui(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Nanchong Central Hospital,The Second Clinical College of North Sichuan Medical University,Nanchong 637000,Sichuan,China;Department of Obstetrics,Wuhan Children's Hospital(Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital),Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science&Technology,Wuhan 430000,China;IT Academy,China West Normal University,Nanchong 637000,Sichuan,China)
出处 《西部医学》 2020年第10期1513-1516,1524,共5页 Medical Journal of West China
基金 南充市科技局项目(16YFZJ0029,18SXHZ0126)。
关键词 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠 术中出血 危险因素 异位妊娠 剖宫产 Cesarean scar pregnancy Intraoperative hemorrhage Risk factors Ectopic pregnancy Cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献42

  • 1金力,范光升,郎景和.剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的早期诊断与治疗[J].生殖与避孕,2005,25(10):630-634. 被引量:243
  • 2Litwicka K, Greco E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review ofmanagement options[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2013,25(6):456-461. DOI: 10.1097/GC0.0000000000000023.
  • 3Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, et al. Caesarean scarpregnancy: issues in management[J]. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol, 2004, 23(3):247-253.
  • 4Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2002, 57(8):537-543.
  • 5Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000,16(6):592-593.
  • 6Liu S,Sun J, Cai B, et al. Management of Cesarean ScarPregnancy Using Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2016,23(5):707-711. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.012.
  • 7Wang M, Yang Z, Li Y,et al. Conservative management ofcesarean scar pregnancies: a prospective randomizedcontrolled trial at a single center[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015,8(10):18972-18980.
  • 8Yin XH, Yang SZ, Wang ZQ, et al. Injection of MTX for thetreatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: comparison betweendifferent methods[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2014, 7(7):1867-1872.
  • 9Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First-trimesterdiagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into thelower uterine segment Cesarean section scar[J]. UltrasoundObstet Gynecol, 2003,21(3):220-227. DOI: 10.1002/uog.56.
  • 10ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 94: Medical management ofectopic pregnancy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2008,111(6):1479-1485. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817d201e.

共引文献731

同被引文献53

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部