文化的创意基因与创意国家建设——中西比较视野下的中国文化创意传统研究

Cultural Innovation Genes and Innovative Country Construction--Research on Chinese Cultural Innovative Tradition from the Perspective of a Comparison of China and the West

“创意”的现代含义,尤其是“创意产业”意义上的含义,来源于西方,中国文化对创意的哲学性认可还是近20年的事情,在认识“创意”,指认文化中的“创意”基因时,会被迫地使用西方标准。创意,应该有中国解释。中国文化的创意基因转型,应该立基于中国社会基础及文化传统。站在西方中心主义立场,无法真正理解东方式中国文化的创意基因的内在多样性,不能理解这种创意基因的中国式内在矛盾及其统一。中国的“道”有三重意味,一是本源、本体,二是言、说(揭示出来、敞开出来),三是道路。从“道”出发,沿着“道”发展,到达“道”本身,这是对中国文化创意基因进行哲学指认的起点。从发达国家的“创意国家”实践来看,“创意国家”概念,并不是“创意经济”概念的简单升级版,而是世界进入创意经济时代之后,各国政府为应对创意经济时代新特性而提出的“新型国家发展和治理”理念。中国应该依据自己的传统建立有中国特色的创意国家发展战略。

The modern sense of“innovation”,especially the sense of“innovative industry”,originates in the West.Chinese interpretation of its philosophical sense starts only twenty years ago,so it is natural to passively adopts western standards in cognizing cultural innovation.“Innovation”thus calls for a Chinese interpretation.Innovative genetic transformation in Chinese culture should be based on Chinese social and cultural tradition.Starting from western centralism,it is hard to really understand the internal diversity of oriental Chinese cultural innovative genes,not to mention their inherent conflicts and unity with Chinese features.“Dao”has three senses in Chinese,namely,origin and ontology,discussion and elaboration(open preaching),and routes.A philological identification of Chinese cultural innovative gene should start from“Dao”,progress along“Dao”,and finally arrive at“Dao”itself.From the practice of“innovative countries”among developed nations,an“innovative country”is not merely an upgraded“innovative economy”.Instead,it is a principle of“new national development and governance”,put forward by different governments to adapt to newly arising innovative economic features.China should construct its own development strategies of an innovative country with Chinese characteristics.