期刊文献+

基于科学论证视角的职前科学教师培养研究述评 被引量:5

A Review of the Research Literature on the Development of Pre-Service Science Teachers Based on the Perspective of Scientific Argument
原文传递
导出
摘要 目前基于科学论证的教学设计研究成果缺乏,且科学教师论证水平普遍较低,且未养成习惯。通过文献法,关注国际本主题相关实证研究成果,发现职前科学教师对科学论证具有不同的理解,科学论证对职前科学教师科学本质观、科学概念和论证能力有影响。基于文献总结,从培养论证能力的专业课程设置、社会性科学议题教学和学科知识强化等3个方面提出建议。 There are few research results of instructional design based on scientific argumentation.Moreover,the level of argumentation of science teachers is generally low,and the teachers have not developed the usual argumentation habits.The article focuses on the results of international empirical research on this topic through literature review.It is found that pre-service science teachers have different understandings of scientific argumentation,and the experience of scientific argumentation has an impact on the pre-service science teacher’s view of the nature of science,scientific concepts and argumentation ability.Based on the literature summary,suggestions are made from three aspects:professional curriculum setting for cultivating argumentation ability,teaching of socioscientific issues and strengthening content knowledge.
作者 陈凯 林佳依 王坤 CHEN Kai;LIN Jia-Yi;WANG Kun(College of Environment Science,Nanjing Xiaozhuang University,Nanjing 211171,China)
出处 《化学教育(中英文)》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第18期61-68,共8页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
基金 2018年南京晓庄学院校级科研高层次培育项目“科学教师专业成长的数据挖掘及相关决策研究”(2018NXY17) 国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2018年度教育学一般课题“乡村教师的文化境域及改善研究”(BHA180148)。
关键词 科学论证 职前科学教师 教师教育 论证能力 论证意识 scientific argumentation pre-service science teacher teacher education argumentation ability argumentation awareness
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献34

  • 1冯宇,梁永平.初中生物质微粒性知识探查及其教学策略的实施[J].中小学教材教学(小学版),2005(1):52-55. 被引量:2
  • 2梁永平.在化学微观认识学习中发展学生科学本质理解的思考[J].化学教育,2006,27(3):9-13. 被引量:18
  • 3熊明辉.论证评价的非形式逻辑模型及其理论困境[J].学术研究,2007(9):73-79. 被引量:7
  • 4American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1993. Benchmarks for science literacy. New York; Oxford University Press.
  • 5Berland, L.K., and D. Hammer. 2012. Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (1): 68-94.
  • 6Berland, L.K., and B.J. Reiser. 2009. Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education 93 (1): 26-55.
  • 7Braaten, M., and M. Windschitl. 2011. Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education 95 (4): 639-669.
  • 8Bybee, R. 2011. Scientific and engineering practices in K 12 classrooms: Understanding A Framework for K-12 Science Education. The Science Teacher 78 (9). 34-40.
  • 9Hammer, D., SeeinK the science studies of student and E.H. van Zee. 2006. in children's thinking,, Case inquiry in physical science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • 10Kenyon, L., C. Schwarz, and B. Hug. 2008. The benefits of scientific modeling. Science and Children 46 (2): 40-44.

共引文献23

同被引文献52

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部