再论“双层区隔”:虚构、纪实的性质与判断困境

Re visiting the“Double Framing”Principle:The Nature of Fictional and Factual Narrative and the Judgemental Dilemma

本文对于由赵毅衡先生提出、谭光辉教授进一步阐发的"双层区隔"论,从"双层区隔"作为辨识标准还是性质规定、二度区隔的"进一步再现"的性质、二度区隔是否虚构所独有、虚构区隔框架与人格-框架二元叙述者是否合一、虚构框架是客观存在还是主观认定等方面进行了再讨论,并认为建立在模仿叙述基础之上的"双层区隔"论在处理非自然叙述(反模仿的虚构叙述)时可能会遇到挑战。本文建议从修辞交流的理想情况及非理想情况的不同层面讨论虚构、纪实问题,进而以影射作品、戏拟文本、戏剧表演等较复杂情况讨论了虚构、纪实的判断困境。

This paper revisits the "double framing" principle,a theory proposed by Mr Zhao Yiheng and further developed by Tan Guanghui,and discusses the following questions:Is the "double framing" principle an identifying criterion or a kind of characterisation?What is the nature of secondary segregation?Is secondary segregation peculiar to fictional narrative?Is the fictional separation in the same frame as the personality-frame binary narrator?Is the fictional frame objective or subjective?This paper holds that the "double framing" principle,based on mimetic narratives,seems to face challenges when dealing with unatural narratives(anti-mimetic fictional narratives).Therefore,this paper suggests that fictional and factual issues should be examined at different levels of ideal and non-ideal rhetorical communication situations,and discusses the dilemma of judging fictional and factual narratives in more complex situations,such as insinuative texts,parody texts and performances.