期刊文献+

医疗损害纠纷诉讼案件分析--以江苏省为例 被引量:10

Analyzing The Lawsuits of Medical Damage Dispute Sampled with Jiangsu Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析江苏省医疗损害责任纠纷案例发生的特点,为缓解当前紧张的医患关系提出相应的参考意见方法:从中国裁判文书网公布的文书中,对江苏省2013年至2018年1421件医疗损害责任纠纷案例进行统计分析。结果:0~9岁与60〜69岁是纠纷的高发年龄段;发生纠纷较多的前三个科室分别为骨科(20.1%)、心血管外科(20.1%)及妇产科(18.9%);纠纷主要集中在三级医疗机构(60.1%);发生医疗损害责任纠纷的主要原因是医疗技术水平(44.5%);纠纷的主要鉴定机构为医学会(92.1%);鉴定人出庭仅占4.2%;赔偿金额主要集中在20~50万元,案均赔偿20.1万元,总赔偿额高达29097.5万元,结论:规避和减少医疗纠纷需要加强医疗质量管理,提高医疗技术水平,完善医疗风险分担机制。 Objective To analyze the characteristics of medical damage liability dispute lawsuits in Jiangsu Province,and put forward countermeasures to alleviate the doctor-patient relationship. Methods 421 cases of medical damage liability dispute lawsuits in Jiangsu Province from the documents published by China Judicial Documents Network from 2013 to 2018 were analyzed.Results The people aged from 0 to 9 years old and from 60 to 69 years old had higher incidence of disputes. The top three departments were orthopedics(20. 1%),cardiovascular surgery(20. 1%) and gynecology and obstetrics(18. 9%). The disputes were mainly concentrated in tertiary medical institutions(60. 1%). The main reason for disputes of medical damage liability was the level of medical technology(44. 5%). The main appraisal body of the dispute is the Medical Association(92. 1%). Only 4. 2%of the appraisers appeared in court. The amount of compensation was mainly concentrated from 200,000 to 500,000 RMB Yuan,with an average amount of 20. 1 RMB Yuan and total amount of 29,975,000 RMB Yuan. Conclusion To avoid and reduce medical disputes,it is necessary to strengthen the quality management of medical services,improve medical technology and perfect the medical risk sharing mechanism.
作者 杨风 朱俊敏 许艳秋 刘玉秀 石武祥 Yang Feng(School of Humanities and Management,Guilin Medical University,Guilin,P.R.China)
出处 《中国卫生事业管理》 北大核心 2020年第9期678-682,共5页 Chinese Health Service Management
基金 国家自然科学基金地区基金项目"医院院长文化价值观介导下的医院病人安全文化形成机制及实现路径研究"(71764005) 广西八桂学者"社会医学与卫生事业管理"岗位基金资助。
关键词 医疗损害 医疗质量 鉴定 赔偿 medical injury medical quality appraisal compensation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献170

共引文献266

同被引文献118

引证文献10

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部