期刊文献+

通过评价教材质量促进科学教育——美国《科学教材评价指南》评述 被引量:5

Promote Science Education with Textbook Evaluation--A Review of the Guidelines for the Evaluation of Instructional Materials in Science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教材评价是促进教材和学科发展的关键,而教材评价标准则是教材评价的关键所在。为加强科学教材评价,2017年美国生物科学课程研究中心发布了《科学教材评价指南》。该指南作为美国科学教材评价的指导方针,关注以三维学习目标为评价中心、以现实生活为基点、教材对学生的多重评价功能、教材评价手段的全面与严谨这四个方面,试图提升学生学习科学的兴趣和效果。尽管美国学界对该指南存在一定争议,但它一定程度上代表着当前美国科学教材评价的发展方向,可以为我国科学教材评价提供一定启示。 Textbook evaluation is the key to promote the development of textbooks and disciplines and the evaluation criteria is the key to evaluate the textbooks.In order to strengthen the evaluation of scientific textbooks,the American Biological Science Curriculum Research Center released the Guidelines for the Evaluation of Instructional Materials in Science in 2017.As a guideline for the evaluation of American scientific textbooks,it focuses on the threedimensional learning objectives as the evaluation center,based on real life,paying attention to the multiple evaluation functions of teaching materials to students,and paying attention to the comprehensive and rigorous methods of teaching materials evaluation.In these ways,America tries to improve students' interest and effect in learning science.Although the American academic community has some controversy about this guide,it represents the development direction of the current American scientific textbook evaluation to a certain extent,and it can also provide some inspiration for the evaluation of Chinese scientific textbooks.
作者 孔令帅 李超然 KONG Lingshuai;LI Chaoran
出处 《比较教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期137-147,共11页 Journal of Comparative Education
基金 上海市曙光计划“国际组织全球教育治理政策价值取向研究”(课题编号:17SG43)。
关键词 美国 教材评价 科学教育 教材 the United States textbook evaluation science education science textbook
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献23

  • 1中小学教材编写审定管理暂行办法[J].中华人民共和国国务院公报,2002(12):22-24. 被引量:4
  • 2郭宝仙.菲律宾中等教育教科书评价指标体系述评[J].外国中小学教育,2005(7):26-30. 被引量:4
  • 3刘常华.俄罗斯教科书制度概观[J].课程.教材.教法,2007,27(10):93-96. 被引量:6
  • 4王向红,康长运.开放、民主、多样化:韩国教科书制度新走向[J].比较教育研究,2007,28(10):89-92. 被引量:3
  • 5Eraut, M. Goad, L. & Smith, G. The Analysis of Curriculum Materials[M]. Falmer: University of Sussex Press, 1975, (79), 103- 108.
  • 6加拿大安大略省. Guidelines for Approval of Textbooks[EB/OL]. http://www, edu.gov.con. ca/trilliumlist/guide, pdf. 2015 - 2 - 11.
  • 7The American Association of Science. Project Procedure[EB/OL] org/publications/ for the Advancement 2061 Analysis http://.project2061 textbook/hsbio/report/ analysis, htm/.2014 - 12 - 18.
  • 8Florida Department of Education. Priorities for Evaluating Instructional Materials: Research Update[EB/OLJ. http://wvrw, fldoe, org/ BIl/instr uct_mat/eval, asp/. 2014 - 12 - 16.
  • 9California Department of Education. Criteria for Evaluating Instructional Materials in Science, Kindergarten Through Grade Eight[EB/ OL]. http://www, cas cience, org/csta/pdf/ science_crit-eria, pdf. 2014 - 12 - 16.
  • 10Yildirim, A. High from Teachers' and Case of History Education Review, School Textbooks in Turkey Students' Perspectives: The Textbooks[J]. Asia Pacific 2006, 7(2): 218-228.

共引文献17

同被引文献28

引证文献5

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部