期刊文献+

基于医护组合团队模式下的社区慢性病管理 被引量:1

Chronic disease management in community based on the model of team of doctors and nurses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析医护组合团队对社区慢性病的管理效果。方法:组建、推行医护组合团队及模式,强调全科医生与社区护士固定组合,明确全科医生与社区护士职责,并完善协调机制,全权负责辖区慢性病患者的全方位管理。结果:管理1年后,辖区慢性病患者对健康生活方式的接受度更高,血压控制达标率提升8.90%、血糖控制达标率提升9.35%,慢性病得到有效控制;全科门诊首诊就诊率增长12.92%,患者满意率也提高3.33%。结论:医护组合团队模式是一种有效的社区慢性病管理模式,能更加合理地配置现有医疗资源,全方位管理慢性病患者,有效促进居民健康。 Objective:To analyze the effect of team of doctors and nurses on community chronic disease management.Methods:Set up and implement the combination team and mode of doctors and nurses,emphasize the fixed combination of general practitioners and community nurses,clarify the responsibilities of general practitioners and community nurses,and improve the coordination mechanism,be fully responsible for the comprehensive management of chronic disease patients in the jurisdiction.Results:After one year of management,patients with chronic diseases in the jurisdiction had higher acceptance of healthy lifestyle,the compliance rate of blood pressure control increased by 8.90%,the compliance rate of blood glucose control increased by 9.35%,chronic diseases were effectively controlled.The first visit rate of general outpatient service increased by 12.92%,the satisfaction rate of patients was also increased by 3.33%.Conclusion:The model of team of doctors and nurses is an effective community chronic disease management model,it can allocate the existing medical resources more reasonably,manage the patients with chronic diseases in an all-round way,and effectively promote the health of residents.
作者 张红叶 Zhang Hongye(Bailian Community Health Service Center of Jinchang Street,Gusu District,Suzhou City,Jiangsu Suzhou 215000)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2020年第29期188-189,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 医护组合团队 社区慢性病 社区护理 慢性病管理 Team of doctors and nurses Community chronic disease Community nursing Chronic disease management
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献51

  • 1卫生部统计信息中心.2008中国卫生服务调查研究第四次家庭健康询问调查分析报告.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2009.
  • 2Quinn CC,Port CL,Zimmerman S,et al.Short-stay nursing home rehabilitation patients:transitional care problems pose research challenges.J Am Geriatr Soc,2008,56 (10):1940-1945.
  • 3van Walraven C,Oake N,Jennings A,et al.The association between continuity of care and outcomes:a systematic and critical review.J Eval Clin Pract,2010,16 (5):947-956.
  • 4Popejoy LL,Moylan K,Galambos C.A review of discharge planning research of older adults 1990-2008.West J Nurs Res,2009,31 (7):923-947.
  • 5Jaber R,Braksmajer A,Trilling J.Group visits for chronic illness care:models,benefits and challenges.Fam Pract Manag,2006,13(1):37-40.
  • 6Wheelock C,Savageau JA,Silk H,et al.Improving the health of diabetes patients through resident-initiated group visits.Fam Med,2009,41 (2):116-119.
  • 7Loney-Hutchinson LM,Provilus AD,Jean-Louis G,et al.Group visits in the management of diabetes and hypertension:effect on glycemic and blood pressure control.Curr Diab Rep,2009,9(3):238-242.
  • 8Dontje K,Forrest K.Implementing group visits:are they effective to improve diabetes self-management outcomes?.J Nurse Prac,2011,7(7):571-577.
  • 9Davis AM,Sawyer DR,Vinci LM.The potential of group visits in diabetes care.Clin Diab,2008,26(2):58-62.
  • 10高俊岭.社区高血压群组干预模式的评价研究.上海:复旦大学,2009.

共引文献27

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部