期刊文献+

科技重大风险与人类安全危机:前所未有的双重挑战及其治理对策 被引量:18

Huge Scientific Risk and Human Security Crisis:Unprecedented Dual Challenges and Its Governance Measures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 开展科技重大风险治理研究,确保人类安全与可持续创新及发展是当务之急。科技重大风险研究主要包括三项内容:一是研判科技重大风险的严峻性与紧迫性,这是首要前提;二是确定开展科技重大风险专门研究的重点难点,这是研究主体;三是探讨新型决策机制,这是治理对策的切入点和启动方案。指出近年来尖端科技发展迅速、威力异常,呈现出科技大爆发态势,其不可控性和不确定性日益增强,科技伦理事件频发,贸易战、科技战、军备竞赛不断升级,科技重大风险愈演愈烈,而当前防控科技重大风险的多道人类安全防线都存在严重漏洞,深陷危机,人类面临前所未有的双重挑战。为此急需新型决策机制,急需启动从粗放式创新与竞争向可持续创新与合作的大转型予以应对。 To ensure human security as well as sustainable innovation and development,it is essential to investigate significant scientific risks.This paper proposes that research on huge scientific risks includes three aspects:analysis of the seriousness and urgency of huge a scientific risk,which forms the premise for this study;identification of the key issues and difficulties;and discussion of new decision-making mechanisms,which form the basis of governance measures for managing scientific risks.In recent years,there have been cutting-edge developments in technology,which has grown rapidly and powerfully.This has been followed by it being more uncontrollable and uncertain,which has led to cases of scientific ethics misconduct.Trade wars,S&T wars,and arms races are escalating,and there are increasing cases of huge scientific risks.However,there are serious deficiencies in many human security systems that prevent huge scientific risks.This crisis poses unprecedented dual challenges to the human race.To solve this,a new decision-making mechanism and the transition from extensive creation and competition to sustainable innovation and cooperation are urgently needed.
作者 刘益东 Liu Yidong(Institute for the History of Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China)
出处 《工程研究(跨学科视野中的工程)》 2020年第4期321-336,共16页 JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING STUDIES
基金 中国科学院自然科学史研究所重点培育方向“科技的社会风险”项目(E029001101)。
关键词 科技重大风险 致毁知识 人类安全 非传统安全 底线思维 硬伦理 分配革命 竞争方式陷阱 huge scientific risk ruin-causing knowledge human security non-traditional security bottom-line thinking hard ethics reapportionment revolution competition modes trap
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献78

  • 1N.马尔科姆.维特根斯坦论语言和规则[J].世界哲学,1994(5):41-47. 被引量:9
  • 2李伯聪.工程伦理学的若干理论问题——兼论为“实践伦理学”正名[J].哲学研究,2006(4):95-100. 被引量:46
  • 3[英]A.N.怀特海.观念的冒险[M].周邦宪译,贵阳:贵州人民出版社,2000:267,262-264,263.
  • 4[法]雅克·德里达.马克思的幽灵[J].何一,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.
  • 5[美]美国焊接学会.钎焊手册(第三版)[K].北京:国防工业出版社,1984..
  • 6邓波,贺凯.试论科学知识、技术知识与工程知识[J].自然辩证法研究,2007,23(10):41-46. 被引量:74
  • 7(美)罗兹(Rhodes,R.)著,李汇川等.原子弹出世纪[M]世界知识出版社,1990.
  • 8中国科学院.科学发展报告[M]科学出版社,2000.
  • 9[英]贝弗里奇(W·I·B·Beveridge) 著,陈捷.科学研究的艺术[M]科学出版社,1979.
  • 10The National Science Board. Preparingthe Next Generation of STEM Innovators:Identifying and Developing our Nation'sHuman Capital [EB/OL] .National ScienceFoundation, May 5,2010.VII.http://powerofdiscovery.org/preparing-next-gener at ion-stem-inno vat or s-identify in g-a nd-developing-our-nations-human-capitol.

共引文献142

同被引文献154

引证文献18

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部