期刊文献+

人工智能之伤:人的存在与意义缺失难题——马克思实践哲学批判向度解读 被引量:4

The Pain of Artificial Intelligence as a Conundrum for Human Existence:An Interpretation from Marx’s Criticism of Practical Philosophy
原文传递
导出
摘要 人工智能的诞生证明时代最大的变化是变化本身的真理性。然而,当"共感式参与"缺失的技术负面直击内心深层情感,人在沉浸于技术欣喜之余却无法把握与人工智能的相处模式,并全然陷入"人类越强大,社会越趋非人化"的怪圈。技术在确立人的生存本质的同时又遭遇使人的存在意义缺失难题,主要体现在人工智能彰显物质自由与遮蔽情感原欲的矛盾中。马克思的辩证实践思想为人工智能难题的开解提供启示。实践本身是具有丰富内涵的概念,生存论意义上的劳动与确立人类本质的实践并不具有同一性,合理把握实践的张力才能弥合人的存在与意义缺失的裂缝,坚持人工智能应用的人本原则是技术合理发展的应有之义。 The birth of AI proves that the biggest change in the era is the change itself.However,when people are immersed in the joy of technology,the lack of "common sense of participation" directly hits their inner feelings.And people completely fall into the weird circle that the more powerful human beings is,the more dehumanized society is.While establishing the essence of human existence,technology encounters the problem of lack of meaning.It is mainly reflected in the contradiction between AI manifesting material freedom and shadowing the original desire.Marx’s dialectical practice thought provides enlightenment for the problems.Practice itself is a concept with rich connotation.Labor in the sense of existentialism is not identical with the practice of establishing human nature.A reasonable grasp of the tension of practice is necessary to bridge the gap between the existence and the absence of human beings.Adhering to the humanistic principle of AI application is the proper meaning inside the rational development of technology.
作者 王丽霞 WANG Lixia(School of Marxism,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,310028)
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第9期100-105,共6页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
关键词 技术 人的本质 实践 Technology Human nature Practice
  • 相关文献

同被引文献55

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部