期刊文献+

新式无保护会阴接生技术的临床效果分析

Analysis of clinical effect of new unprotected perineum delivery technique
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨新式无保护会阴接生技术的临床应用效果。方法:以2018年10月至2018年11月采用新式无保护会阴接生技术分娩的173例初产妇作为观察组,以2018年8月至2018年9月采用传统保护会阴接生技术的初产妇170例作为对照组,比较两组初产妇会阴侧切率、会阴裂伤情况及分娩后出血量、第二产程时间。结果:观察组会阴完整率及会阴Ⅰ度裂伤发生率均高于对照组,会阴侧切率及会阴Ⅱ度裂伤发生率均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组分娩后2h内出血量及第二产程时间与对照组比较差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:新式无保护会阴接生技术可明显降低初产妇会阴侧切率及会阴裂伤程度,且无不良分娩结局,使分娩回归自然,提高了分娩质量。 Objective:To explore the clinical application effect of the new unprotected perineum delivery technique.Methods:The observation group took 173 cases of primary mothers who had delivered with the new unprotected perineum delivery technique from October 2018 to November 2018,and the control group took 170 cases of primary mothers who had used the traditional protected perineum delivery technique from August 2018 to September 2018.Comparison of perineum lateral incision rate,perineum laceration,bleeding volume after delivery and second labor time in two primary mothers.Results:The percentage of perineum integrity and the incidence of perineum I-degree laceration were higher in the observation group than in the control group,and the incidence of perineum lateral laceration and perineum I-degree laceration were lower in the control group.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);There was no significant difference between the 2h internal hemorrhage and the second labor time in the observation group and the control group(P>0.05).Conclusion:The new type of unprotected perineum delivery technique can significantly reduce the perinealtomy rate and the degree of perineolysis laceraton,and there is no adverse outcome of childbirth,so that the delivery returnis to nature and improves the quality of delivery,which is worth clinical promotion.
作者 李玉环 Li Yuhuan(Dingtao District People's Hospital of Heze City, Heze, Shandong 274100)
出处 《中外女性健康研究》 2020年第20期4-5,41,共3页 Women's Health Research
关键词 新式无保护会阴接生技术 传统保护会阴接生技术 会阴裂伤 第二产程时间 New unprotected perineum delivery techniques Traditional protection of perineum delivery techniques Perineum laceration Second birth time
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献53

  • 1Berghella V,Baxter JK,Chauhan SP,et al. Evidence-based labor and delivery management[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2008,199 (5) :445-454.
  • 2McKinnie V,Swift SE ,Wang W. The effect of pregnancy and mode of delivery on the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2005,193:512-517.
  • 3Frankman EA,Wang L,Bunker CH,et al. Episiotomy in the United States:has anything changed? [J]. Am J Obstet Gyneeol, 2009,200 (5) : 5731-5737.
  • 4McCandlish R,Bowler U,van Asten H,et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour[J].Brit J Obstet Gynaec,1998,105(12) : 1262-1272.
  • 5Foroughipour A,Firuzeh F,Ghahiri A. The effect of perineal control with hands-on and hand-poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcome[J].J Res Med Sci,2011,16(8): 1040-1046.
  • 6Rozita R,Sussan S,Chan YH,et al. A Comparison of the "Hands-Off'and "Hands-On"Methods to Reduce Perineal Lacerations :A Randomised Clinical Trial[J]. J Obstet and Gyneco India, 2014,64 ( 6 ) : 425 -429.
  • 7Mayerhofer K,Bodner-Adler B,Bodner K,et al. Traditional care of the perineum during birth :a prospective,randomized,multicenter study of 1076 women[J].J Reproduct Med,2002,47 (6) :477-482.
  • 8Da Costa ADSC,Riesco MLGA. comparison of "hands off" versus "hands on" techniques for decreasing perineal lacerations during birth[J].J Midwifery Worn Heal,2006,51 (2) : 106-111.
  • 9Andrews V,Sultan AH,Thakar R,et al. Occult anal sphincter injuries-myth or reality? [J]. Bjog-int J Obstet Gy,2006,113 (2) : 195 -200.
  • 10Sartore A.De Seta F,Maso G,et al. The effect of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvie floor function after vaginal delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecal,2004,103(4) :669-673.

共引文献154

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部