浅谈人格化叙事在科学研究中的生存境遇

On the Existence of Personalized Narrative in Scientific Research

千百年来,关于“抽象的人格化叙事在具象的科学研究中是否起到一定的作用”的问题,一直被学界讨论,但至今仍未有明确定论。自培根时代以来,哲学家和科学家们就一直在批评人格化,但他们自己却并不能对人格化有所“免疫”。从万物有灵论的奠基到人工智能的亮相,人格化一直是困扰各学界的难题,对其的去留并没有一个准确的定论。用辩证的眼光看待人格化在科学领域中的边缘生存,或许我们会有更惊喜的发现。

When the abstract personalized narrative enters the concrete scientific research by mistake, has the scientific community left a place for it? Can personalization leave an indelible stroke in scientific research? Tracing the source of the personification will find that although it has "survived" for thousands of years, it has not yet been "corrected". Since the Bacon era,philosophers and scientists have been criticizing personality, but they cannot be "immune" to personality themselves. From the foundation of animism to the appearance of artificial intelligence,personalization has always been a problem that puzzles various academic circles. Go or stay? There is no accurate conclusion.Looking at the marginal survival of personalization in the field of science with a dialectical perspective, there may be even more surprising discoveries.