期刊文献+

高水平论文在线影响力特征分析与评价研究——以生命科学领域为例 被引量:1

Online Characteristics Analysis and Influence Evaluation of Top Papers in Life Science
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的/意义】学术论文是科学交流的主要介质,高水平论文是在学术交流活动中产生的高学术影响力的研究成果,通过对高水平论文在线影响力的特征分析与评价可以发现高水平论文在在线交流中的特征规律,更好地服务于科学实践。【方法/过程】选取ESI的生命科学领域高水平论文,通过文献计量法、统计分析法、对比分析法对使用特征与媒介特征进行分析,计算了论文在基金资助影响下的差异率与转化率,选取Altmetrics指标并构建了基于Altmetrics的高水平论文在线影响力评价模型,对指标赋权并计算在线影响力得分。【结果/结论】生命科学领域的高水平论文数量呈指数增长,关于生命科学的研究持续升温;论文使用次数对被引次数具有积极影响,基金资助提高了论文使用次数转化为引用次数的效率;Altmetrics指标覆盖较为全面,论文受社会主流媒体的关注度高,现有评价赋权标准具有片面性;在线影响力最高的论文指标分布均衡,关于生态环境的研究取得了极高影响力,中国在生命科学领域中的研究取得了高水平的在线影响力,但是被引水平与主要国家还存在差距。 【Purpose/significance】Papers are the main medium of scientific communication,and top papers are the research results of high academic influence generated in academic exchange activities.The on line communicaiton characteristics and rules of top papers can be found through the analysis of online influencing characteristics of top papers,which is conducive to better service for scientific practice.【Method/process】Selecting top papers from ESI in the field of Life Science and analyzing the distribution characteristics of papers.Analyzing usage characteristics and media characteristics of papers through bibliometrics,statistical analysis and comparative analysis.Calculating usage difference proportion,citation difference proportion and usage transform proportion under the influence of fund support.Selecting indicators and building an online impact evaluation model of top papers in Life Science based on Altmetrics.【Result/conclusion】Firstly,the number of top papers increased exponentially,and increasingly becoming the focus of research.Secondly,the usage has a positive impact on the citation.Funding improves the efficiency of converting usages into citations.Thirdly,Altmetrics index covers a comprehensive range.This category of papers has been reported more by mainstream media,and the existing evaluation index system is one-sided.Finally,papers with higher online force have the characteristics of balanced index distribution.Papers about ecological environment had higher score of influence.China has achieved a high level of online influence,but citations at a low level in Life Science.
作者 亓永康 赵蓉英 QI Yong-kang;ZHAO Rong-ying(Library of Jiangsu Normal University,Xuzhou 221116,China;School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出处 《情报科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第9期121-128,共8页 Information Science
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“构建中国话语权的评价科学理论、方法与应用体系研究”(18ZDA325) 国家社会科学基金项目“中国学者国际学术论文影响力评价研究”(16BTQ055)。
关键词 高水平论文 Altmetrics 特征分析 影响力评价 生命科学 top paper altmetrics characteristics analysis influence evaluation Life Science
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献185

  • 1杨思洛,毕艳娜.基于Web2.0的数字参考咨询服务创新[J].图书馆学研究,2007(2):75-78. 被引量:17
  • 2张玉华,潘云涛.科技论文影响力相关因素研究[J].编辑学报,2007,19(2):81-84. 被引量:58
  • 3侯跃芳,崔雷,吴迪.应用引文共引聚类-内容词分析法对学科发展的研究[J].情报学报,2007,26(2):309-314. 被引量:20
  • 4Van Raan A E J. Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics, 1996, 36 (6) : 397 -420.
  • 5Glanzel W. Seven myths in bibkiometrics: About facts and fiction in quantitative science studies. Proceedings of WIS 2008, http://www. collnet. de/Berlin-2008/.
  • 6Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2005, 102(46) : 16569 - 16572.
  • 7Lehmann S, et al. Measures for measures. Nature, 2006, 444(7122) : 1003 - 1004.
  • 8Doring T F. Quality evaluation needs some better quality tools. Nature, 2007, 445 (7129 ) : 709.
  • 9Garwin L, Lincoln T. A century of nature: Twenty-One discoveries that changed science and the world. University of Chicago Press, 2003.
  • 10David A. Pendlebury. White Paper - Using Bibliometrics in Evaluating[ R]. Research Department ,Thomson Reuters,2008.

共引文献473

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部