期刊文献+

超声联合检测子宫瘢痕前壁下段厚度对剖宫产再次妊娠女性合理选择分娩方式的指导意义 被引量:12

Clinical significance of ultrasound combined with the measurement of the thickness of the lower part of the anterior wall of the uterine scar in the rational choice of delivery mode for the women of second trimester after cesarean section
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价经腹超声联合经阴道超声检测剖宫产后再次妊娠女性子宫瘢痕前壁下段厚度的临床价值。方法:选取2017年8月至2019年8月诸暨市人民医院收治的妊娠晚期剖宫产后再次妊娠患者180例为研究对象,患者均分别于妊娠32周、34周、36周和38周进行经腹超声检测和经阴道超声检测,比较腹部超声及经阴道超声对于患者子宫下段瘢痕显影率情况,分析不同瘢痕愈合分级患者子宫瘢痕前壁下段厚度差异及随妊娠周期增加的变化情况,跟踪患者分娩结局,统计不同瘢痕愈合分级患者分娩方式及先兆子宫破裂发生情况差异,记录分娩过程中和产后24 h内出血量。结果:腹部超声联合经阴道超声检测对于剖宫后再次妊娠女性子宫瘢痕显影率(100.00%,180/180)显著高于腹部超声(58.89%,106/180)和阴道超声(91.11%,164/180)单独检测水平(χ2=93.147、16.744,均P<0.001);各瘢痕愈合分级患者不同妊娠周期的子宫瘢痕前壁下段厚度差异均有统计学意义(F=35.716~69.247,均P<0.001),各瘢痕愈合分级组组内不同妊娠周期之间的子宫瘢痕前壁下段厚度差异均有统计学意义(F=15.965~24.361,均P<0.001),各组患者子宫瘢痕前壁下段厚度超声检测数值均随妊娠周期的延长而降低(t=5.726~18.051,均P<0.001);各瘢痕愈合分级患者分娩方式及先兆子宫破裂发生率差异均有统计学意义(χ2=39.669、8.312,均P<0.001);各瘢痕愈合分级患者组之间分娩过程中出血量及产后24 h内出血量差异均有统计学意义(F=19.635、27.174,均P<0.001)。结论:腹部超声联合经阴道超声检测可提高子宫瘢痕显影率,检测子宫瘢痕前壁下段厚度有助于指导剖宫后再次妊娠女性选择合理分娩方式,并指导医师及时采取预防分娩风险的措施。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical significance of transabdominal ultrasound combined with transvaginal ultrasound in detecting the thickness of the lower anterior wall of uterine scar in women who are pregnant again after cesarean section.Methods:From August 2017 to August 2019,180 cases of second pregnancy after cesarean section in late pregnancy who admitted to Zhuji People's Hospital were studied.All patients were examined by transabdominal ultrasound and transvaginal ultrasound at 32,34,36 and 38 weeks of gestation respectively.The development rate of scar in the lower segment of uterus was compared between abdominal ultrasound and transvaginal ultrasound.The differences of the thickness of the lower segment of the anterior wall of the uterus in patients with different scar healing grades and the change with the increase of gestation cycle were analyzed.The delivery outcome of the patients was followed up and the statistics was made.The differences of delivery mode and the occurrence of precursory uterine rupture was recorded in different scar healing grades.Results:The uterine scar development rate in women who were pregnant again after cesarean section of abdominal ultrasound combined with transvaginal ultrasound(100.00%,180/180)was significantly higher than that of abdominal ultrasound(58.89%,106/180)and vaginal ultrasound(91.11%,164/180)alone(χ2=93.147,16.744,all P<0.001).The difference of the thickness of the lower anterior wall was statistically significant(F=35.716-69.247,all P<0.001).The difference of the thickness of the lower anterior wall of the uterine scar between different gestational periods was statistically significant(F=15.965-24.361,all P<0.001).There were statistically significant differences in delivery mode and incidence of threatened uterine rupture between the groups with different scar healing grades(χ2=39.669,8.312,all P<0.001).There were statistically significant differences in the amount of bleeding during delivery and within 24 h after delivery between the groups with different scar healing grades(F=19.635,27.174,all P<0.001).Conclusion:Abdominal ultrasound combined with transvaginal ultrasound can improve the development rate of uterine scar.Detection of the thickness of the lower part of the anterior wall of uterine scar is helpful to guide women to choose a reasonable mode of delivery after cesarean section,and guide doctors to take timely measures to prevent the risk of delivery.
作者 马亦飞 Ma Yifei(Department of Ultrasound,Zhuji People's Hospital,Zhuji,Zhejiang 311800,China)
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2020年第19期2379-2383,共5页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 妊娠末期 剖宫产术 瘢痕 超声检查 子宫监测 子宫破裂 Pregnancy trimester,third Cesarean section Cicatrix Ultrasonography Uterine monitoring Uterine rupture
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献114

  • 1郭素芳,赵凤敏,吴匡时,崔颖,吴久玲,王临虹,张彤,李伯华.1971年至2003年我国剖宫产率变化趋势及社会人口学影响因素的研究[J].中华围产医学杂志,2005,8(3):145-149. 被引量:117
  • 2谭毅,谢平,陈雪梅.疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式选择[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2007,18(2):123-124. 被引量:17
  • 3Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, et al. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Euniee Kennedy Shriver Na- tional Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 120 (5): 1181-1193.
  • 4American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ( College), Soci- ety for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of the primary eesar- eau delivery [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gyneco1,2014,210 ( 3 ) : 179-193.
  • 5TINELLI A, HURST B S, METTLER L, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of uterine healing after laparoscopic intracapsular myomectomy: an observational study [ J ]. Human Reproduction ( Oxford, England), 2012, 27 (9) : 2664 - 2670.
  • 6VOET L F, BIJ D M, VEERSEMA S, et al. Long - term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding [ J ]. B JOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics&Gynaecology, 2014, 121 (2) : 236 - 244.
  • 7Molina G, Weiser TG, Lipsitz SR, et al. Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality [ J ]. JAMA, 2015,314(21 ) :2263-2270.
  • 8Fuglenes D, Aas E, Botten G, et al. Maternal preference for ce- sarean delivery: do women get what they want? [ J ]. Obstet Gyne- col, 2012,120(2 Pt 1 ):252-260.
  • 9Ji H, Jiang H, Yang L, et al. Factors contributing to the rapid rise of caesarean section : a prospective study of primiparous Chi- nese women in Shanghai [J]. BMJ Open, 2015,5 (11): e008994.
  • 10Crowther CA, Dodd JM, Hiller JE, et al. Planned Vaginal Birth or Elective Repeat Caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial [ J ]. PLoS Med, 2012, 9 ( 3 ) : e1001192.

共引文献257

同被引文献132

引证文献12

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部