期刊文献+

超声引导下腰骶丛联合神经阻滞与硬膜外麻醉在高龄髋关节置换术患者中的应用效果 被引量:5

Application effects of ultrasound-guided lumbosacral plexus block and epidural anesthesia in elderly patients with hip replacement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较超声引导下腰骶丛联合神经阻滞与硬膜外麻醉在高龄髋关节置换术患者中的应用效果。方法将200例高龄髋关节置换术患者根据电脑随机分配方式分为对照组与观察组,各100例。对照组采用硬膜外麻醉,观察组应用超声引导下腰骶丛联合神经阻滞。比较两组的不良反应发生情况、血流动力学指标、术后认知功能障碍发生情况、VAS评分。结果观察组的不良反应总发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。T3时,两组的SBP、DBP、HR均高于T1、T2时,且T1时高于T2时(P<0.05);T1、T2、T3时,观察组的SBP、DBP、HR均高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的术后认知功能障碍发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后2、4、10、24 h,观察组的VAS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论超声引导下腰骶丛联合神经阻滞应用于高龄髋关节置换术患者,可取得显著的麻醉效果,具有较高的安全性,对患者血流动力学影响较小,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To compare the application effect of ultrasound-guided lumbosacral plexus block and epidural anesthesia in elderly patients with hip replacement.Methods A total of 200 elderly patients with hip replacement were divided into control group and observation group according to the computer random distribution,with 100 cases in each group.The control group was given epidural anesthesia,and the observation group was given ultrasound-guided lumbosacral plexus block.The incidence of adverse reactions,hemodynamic indexes,postoperative cognitive dysfunction and VAS score were compared between the two groups.Results The total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).At T3,SBP,DBP and HR of the two groups were higher than those at T1 and T2,and those at T1 were higher than at T2(P<0.05);at T1,T2 and T3,SBP,DBP and HR of the observation group were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).At 2,4,10,24 h after operation,the VAS score of the observation group were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The ultrasound-guided lumbosacral plexus block in elderly patients with hip replacement can achieve significant anesthetic effect,with high safety and less impact on hemodynamics of patients,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
作者 申霞 丁二龙 SHEN Xia;DING Erlong(Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Yulin,Yulin 719000,China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2020年第30期95-97,共3页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 超声引导下腰骶丛联合神经阻滞 硬膜外麻醉 髋关节置换术 ultrasound-guided lumbosacral plexus block epidural anesthesia hip replacement
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献42

  • 1Bickel H, Gradinger R, Kochs E, et al. Incidence and risk factors of delirium after hip surgery. Psychiatr Prax, 2004,31 (7) : 360-365.
  • 2Shukry M, Clyde MC, Kalarickal PL, et al. Dose dexmedetomidine prevent emergence delirium in children after sevoflurane-based gener- al anesthesia? Paediatr Anaesth, 2005,15 (12) : 1098-1104.
  • 3Maldonado JR, Wysong A, van der Starre PJ, et al. Dexmedetomidine and the reduction of postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery. Psy- chosomatics, 2009,50(3) :206-217.
  • 4Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL. Prospective evaluation of the Seda- tion-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. Crit Care Med, 1999,27(7) : 1325-1329.
  • 5lnouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, et al. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of de- lirium. Ann Intern Med, 1990, 113(12):941-948.
  • 6Bhana N, Goa KL, McClellan KJ. Dexmedetomidine. Drugs, 2000,59 (2) :263-268.
  • 7Hall JE, Uhrich TD, Barney JA, et al. Sedative, amnestic, and analge- sic properties of small-dose dexnledetomidine infusions. Anesth Analg, 2000,90( 3 ) : 699-705.
  • 8Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs mid- azolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial. JA- MA, 2009,301 (5) : 489-499.
  • 9刘金虎,岳云.老年非心脏手术患者术后谵妄危险因素分析[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2009,25(2):162-163. 被引量:40
  • 10陈彦青,彭玲,林莹.鼻咽通气道用于肥胖患者麻醉恢复期气道管理的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2009,29(12):1113-1115. 被引量:25

共引文献414

同被引文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部