期刊文献+

非独立创作作品权利归属规则研究

A Study of the Right Adscription Rules of Non-independent Works
下载PDF
导出
摘要 非独立创作作品的智力要素与资本要素来源于不同主体,并基于合同联结起来。为了将资本要素的贡献者纳入权利主体,关于权属规则的立法例有拟制作者、出资移转、直接配置三种。三种方式所使用的核心范畴是作者与原始著作权人。其中,作者是文化概念,原始著作权人则是法学或经济学概念,两者具有不同的内涵与价值,因而具有分离的正当性。我国现有的著作权权属规则存在着体系分裂症。拟制方式会破坏我国一以贯之的作者观,使作者蜕变为一个指代符号,是最劣的表达方式。出资移转方式不符合我国的立法传统。直接配置方式将创作合同的双方主体构造为著作权法上的双主体,且不损害我国现有体系的完整性与社会认可的正义观念,具有面向产业利益的包容性与合理性。 The intellectual and capital elements in non-independent works are derived from different subjects separately,which are bound closely together through contracts.In order to make capital contributors subjects of rights,there are three vertical legal regulations,including fictitious author,transfer by contribution and direct grant of copyright.The kernel conceptions of these three ways are author and initial copyright owner.While author is a cultural concept,initial copyright owner is a legal or economic concept,which has different connotations and values.Thus there is a legitimacy of separation.Our system of attribution rules is split.Fiction will be disruptive to authorship notion and make authorship become a symbol,which is the worst way of expression.Transfer by contribution does not conform to our traditional expression of legislation.Relatively,the mode of direct grant which makes two sides of creation contract become double subjects in copyright law,without prejudice to integrity of our existing system and the concept of justice accepted socially,is widely inclusive and reasonable for the industry interests.
作者 张宇 付继存 ZHANG Yu;FU Jicun(Teaching and Research Department of Ideological and Political Theory Course,Minxi Vocational&Technical College,Longyan 364000,China;Civil,Commercial and Economic Law School,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出处 《邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》 2020年第5期51-58,共8页 Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition
基金 福建省社会科学规划项目“基于MTS架构的体育赛事版权保护研究”(FJ2017C054)。
关键词 非独立创作作品 权属规则 双主体结构 non-independent works adscription rule double-subject structure
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献157

  • 1杨述兴.职务作品和法人作品[J].电子知识产权,2005(5):20-24. 被引量:24
  • 2道.诺斯.制度变迁理论纲要[J].改革,1995(3):52-56. 被引量:205
  • 3刘小玄.现代企业的激励机制:剩余支配权[J].经济研究,1996,31(5):3-11. 被引量:114
  • 4雷蒙·威廉斯.关键词:文化与社会的词汇[M].刘建基,译.北京:三联书店,2005:49.
  • 5李承武.浅析法人作品与职务作品的关系及其在法律适用上的意义.知识产权,1997,(3):15-22.
  • 6雨果.雨果论文学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1980.
  • 7Robert P. Mergset al., lnteUectual Property in the New Technological Age (4th edition), Aspen Publishers, 2006, p. 13, p. 430.
  • 8Paul Goldstein, Copyright, Patent, Trademark and Related State Doctrines (5th edition), Foundation Press, 2002, p.6.
  • 9U. S. Const. art. Ⅰ, §8, cl. 8.
  • 10L. RayPatterson,Copyright and "The Exclusive Right" of Authors, 1 J. Intell. Prop. L. 1, 1993, p. 24.

共引文献194

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部