摘要
“艺术终结”理论历来是学术热点问题,继阿瑟·丹托之后,汉斯·贝尔廷提出了“艺术史终结”理论。他将艺术事件(图画)和艺术史喻为“图画”和“框架”的关系,艺术事件(图画)改变后,艺术史的“框架”就不再与原来的图画相匹配,艺术史的叙事模式也随之改变。当“框架”局限了艺术探讨与艺术思考,破框后艺术史的书写也就成为“艺术史终结”理论后续探讨的重要问题。
The theory of"The End of Art"has always been a hot academic issue.After Arthur Danto,Hans Belting proposed the"End of Art History"theory.He likens art events(pictures)and art history to the relationship between"pictures"and"frames."After art events(pictures)change,the"frames"of art history can no longer match the original pictures.The narrative model also changes accordingly.When the"frame"limits art discussion and thinking,the writing of art history after breaking the frame becomes an important issue for the subsequent discussion of the theory of"the end of art history".
作者
张羽
ZHANG YU(College of Arts, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610068)
出处
《绵阳师范学院学报》
2020年第10期151-155,共5页
Journal of Mianyang Teachers' College