期刊文献+

基于可协商的可转换债券和企业资本结构 被引量:6

Convertible Debt and Capital Structure with Debt Renegotiation Covenant
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文将债务协商机制引入利用普通股和可转换债券融资的上市企业,在一个动态模型框架下分析其对债券投资者行为和企业资本结构的影响。首先分别对采取破产清算和债务协商下,利用可转换债券和普通股融资的企业建模;然后利用风险中性定价方法给出企业证券价值的显示解;最后通过数值结果分析债务协商机制的影响并给出经济解释。数值分析表明:相比企业破产清算,协商可以提高企业价值、股权价值。当股东的谈判能力在一定的范围时,协商可以提高债券价值、降低企业杠杆率,增加社会福利。股东谈判能力越强,可转债投资者的转换时机越早。本文的研究丰富了可转换债券的融资理论,为可转换债券融资企业的去杠杆提供了一定的理论指导。 After 17 th Feb,2017,the convertible bond has become a very popular re-financing tool for listed companies in China due to the new refinancing policy.At the same time,it is noticed that the debt level in Chinese firms is very high and the bankruptcy liquidation cost is huge.So,how to design a reasonable convertible debt contract to reduce debt default risk is a very important question.To fulfill such requirement,debt renegotiation is introduced into convertible bonds in this paper.Most of the existing theoretical research regarding the capital structure with convertible bonds assume that the firm chooses bankruptcy liquidation when it faces financial distress.However,in practice debt renegotiation with debtholders is more popular.Thus,the research of convertible bonds with debt renegotiation on the firms’capital structure has both academic and practical value.Inspired by the composition of convertible bonds and debt renegotiation,a convertible bond financing model based on the trade-off theory is constructed.Firstly,the cash flow of the firm is described by the Geometric Brownian Motion.Secondly,debtholders can choose to negotiate with equityholders or liquidate after trade-off when they face the risk of debt default,and the case of bankruptcy liquida is set as the benchmark model.If the debtholders choose to negotiate with equityholders,debtholders don’t receive coupon payments but a proportionof cash flow,S(x)after negotiation.It is assumed thatθ~*and(1-θ~*)is the proportion of the firm value that equityholders and debtholders receive after negotiation separately,andηand1-ηis the bargaining power of quityholders and debtholders respectively.Thus,theθ~*and S(x)can be solved using the Nash Bargaining model.Thirdly,the value of corporate securities and the algebraic equations of the liquidation,negotiation and conversion threshold are given by the dynamic programming and risk neutral pricing.Lastly,the impact of debt renegotiation on the firm’s capital structure is explored.In the numerical analysis,the base parameter values are taken from Sundaresan and Wang(2007)and Lyandres and Zhdanov(2014)based on the empirical evidence.The results show that debt renegotiation can increase a firm’s value and equity value,compared to the bankruptcy liquidation.For moderate equityholders’bargain power,debt renegotiation could increase debt value,lower leverage ratio,and increase social welfare level at the same time.The larger the equityholders’bargaining power,the earlier the conversion time that debtholders choose.This paper enriches convertible debt financing theory and provides a theoretical guide for firms issuing convertible bond without raising debt level.
作者 张岳松 宋丹丹 陈彪 ZHANG Yue-song;SONG Dan-dan;CHEN Biao(School of Finance and Statistics,Hunan University,Changsha 410079,China;School of Finance,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai,200433,China)
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第9期1-11,共11页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助青年项目(71502054) 湖南省自然科学基金资助青年项目(2020JJ4227)。
关键词 可转换债券 债务协商 资本结构 convertible debt debt renegotiation capital structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献46

  • 1吴联生,白云霞.公司价值、资产收购与控制权转移方式[J].管理世界,2004,20(9):123-130. 被引量:175
  • 2Myers S C, Majluf N S. Corporate financing and invest- ment decisions when firms have information that inves- tors do not have [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1984, 13: 187-221.
  • 3Hansen R G. A theory for the choice of exchange medi- um in the market for corporate control [J]. Journal of Business, 1987, 60: 75-95.
  • 4Fishman M J. Preemptive bidding and the role of the medium of exchange in acquisitions [J]. Journal of Fi- nance, 1989, 44: 41-57.
  • 5Eckbo B E, Giammarino R M, Heinkel R L. Asymmet- ric information and the medium of exchange in take- overs : theory and tests[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1990, 3: 651-675.
  • 6Berkovitch E, Narayanan M. Competiiion and the medi- um of exchange in takeovers [J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1990, 3(2): 153-174.
  • 7Ross S. The determination of financial structure: the in- centive signalling approach [J]. Bell Journal of Econom- ics, 1977, 8: 23-40.
  • 8Jensen M C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers [J]. American Economic Re-view, 1986, 76: 323-329.
  • 9Harris M, Raviv A. Corporate control contests and cap- ital structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics., 1988, 20: 55-86.
  • 10Stulz R. Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control [J]. Jour- nal of Financial Economics, 1988, 20: 25-54.

共引文献19

同被引文献41

引证文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部