期刊文献+

凶险型前置胎盘植入的影响因素及妊娠结局 被引量:27

Influence factors and pregnancy outcomes for pernicious placenta previa with placenta accreta
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探究凶险型前置胎盘(pernicious placenta previa,PPP)植入的影响因素和不同类型PPP的妊娠结局。方法:采用病例对照研究方法收集2013年12月至2018年2月长沙市某三级甲等综合医院收治的PPP患者410例,其中250例伴胎盘植入者为病例组,160例不伴胎盘植入者为对照组,分析两组临床资料与植入的关系,并根据前置胎盘的不同类型(中央、部分、边缘、低置)观察PPP的妊娠结局。结果:Logistic回归结果显示产次>2(OR=3.221)、剖宫产次≥2(OR=3.048)、中央性前置胎盘(OR=3.607)、胎盘位于前壁(OR=4.592)是PPP植入的独立危险因素(P<0.05);居住地为城市(OR=0.614)、孕期系统产检(OR=0.590)是其保护因素(P<0.05)。中央组产妇术中出血量、产后出血率、子宫切除率高于边缘组和低置组,转ICU率、并发症发生率高于边缘组,住院天数多于边缘组(均P’<0.008)。4组死胎率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);中央组早产率高于边缘组和低置组,新生儿体重低于低置组,1 min Apgar评分低于其他3组,窒息率高于其他3组(P’<0.008)。结论:产次>2、剖宫产次≥2、中央性前置胎盘、胎盘位于前壁是PPP植入的独立危险因素;居住地为城市、孕期系统产检是其保护因素。中央性PPP更易导致产妇产后大出血、子宫切除,同时增加胎儿早产、低体重和窒息的风险,严重威胁母婴生命安全。 Objective:To explore the influence factors for pernicious placenta previa(PPP)with placenta accreta and pregnancy outcomes of different types of PPP.Methods:A case-control study was conducted to collect 410 PPP patients admitted to a general hospital in Changsha from December 2013 to February 2018.Two hundred and fifty cases of PPP with placenta accreta were treated as a case group,and 160 cases of PPP without placenta accreta were treated as a control group.The relationship between clinical data and placenta accreta was analyzed,and the pregnancy outcomes of PPP was observed according to different types of placenta previa.Results:Logistic regression showed that delivery times were more than 2(OR=3.221),cesarean section times were more than 2(OR=3.048),central placenta previa(OR=3.607),placental attachment site(anterior wall)(OR=4.592)were independent risk factors for PPP with placenta accrete(P<0.05).Living in cities(OR=0.614),systematic prenatal examination(OR=0.590)were protective factors(P<0.05).Average intraoperative blood loss,postpartum bleeding rate,hysterectomy rate in the central group were all higher than those in the marginal and low-set group.The incidence rates of ICU transfer,complications,and hospital stay were higher or longer than those in the marginal group(P’<0.008).There was no significant difference in stillbirth rate among the 4 groups(P>0.05).Preterm delivery rate was higher than that of the marginal and low-set group,and the birth weight was lower than that of the low-set group.Apgar score at 1 min and asphyxia rate were lower and higher than those of the other 3 groups,respectively(P’<0.008).Conclusion:Delivery times(>2),cesarean section times(≥2),central placenta previa,placenta attachment site(anterior wall)are independent risk factors for PPP with placenta accreta.Living in cities,systematic prenatal examination were protective factors.The central PPP is more likely to lead to postpartum hemorrhage,hysterectomy,and increases in the risk of preterm birth,low birth weight as well as asphyxia of fetus,which seriously threatens maternal and fetal life.
作者 侯宜萍 周昔红 石理红 彭金丽 王赛 HOU Yiping;ZHOU Xihong;SHI Lihong;PENG Jinli;WANG Sai(Xiangya Nursing School,Central South University,Changsha 410013;Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section,Second Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,Changsha 410011;Department of Obstetrics,Second Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,Changsha 410011,China)
出处 《中南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第9期1074-1081,共8页 Journal of Central South University :Medical Science
基金 湖南省自然科学基金(2019JJ80049) 中南大学湘雅二医院临床护理科研基金(2017-YHL-25)。
关键词 凶险型前置胎盘 胎盘植入 相关因素 剖宫产 pernicious placenta previa placenta accreta related factors cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献49

  • 1谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:118-119.
  • 2Chattopadhyay SK,Kharifll,Sherbeeni MM.Placenta praevia and accrete after previous caesarean section[J].Euro J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,1993,52(3):151-156.
  • 3Chantraine F,Langhoff-Roos J.Abnormally invasive placenta-AIP.Awareness and proactive management is necessary[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2013,92:369-371.
  • 4Grobman WA,Gersnoviez R,Landon MB,et al.Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior cesarean deliveries[J].Obstet Gynecol,2007,110(6):1249.1255.
  • 5Sivan E,Spira M,Achiron R,etal.Prophylactic pelvic artery catheterization and embolization in women:l with placenta:can it prevent cesarean hysterectomy[J].Am J Perinatd,2010,27(6):455-461.
  • 6Sumigama S,Itakura A,OtaT,et al.Placenta previa increta/percretain Japan:a retrospective study of ultrasound findings,management and clinical course[J].Obstet Gynaecol Res,2007,5:606-609.
  • 7Héquet D,Ricbourg A,Sebbag D,et al.Placenta accreta:screening,management and complications[J].Gynecol Obstet Fertil,2013,41(1):31-37.
  • 8Steins Bisschop CN,Schaap TP,Vogelvang TE,et al.Invasive placentation and uterus preserving treatment modalities:a systematic review[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet,2011,284(2):491-502.
  • 9Aggarwal R,Suneja A,Vaid NB,et al.Morbidly adherent placenta:a critical review[J].J Obstet Gynaecol India,2012,62(1):57-61.
  • 10刘兴会,姚强.凶险型前置胎盘的诊断及处理[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2011,27(2):85-89. 被引量:151

共引文献362

同被引文献239

引证文献27

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部