期刊文献+

社区不同干预模式对糖尿病患者生活质量及血压、血糖值影响的评价 被引量:4

Evaluation of the Effect of Different Intervention Models on the Life Quality,Blood Pressure and Blood Glucose Level among Diabetic Patients in Community
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在糖尿病患者中开展健康教育和患者自我管理活动对于其生活质量、血压、血糖三方面的影响。方法按照随机对照试验研究进行设计,以社区为研究地点,将自愿参加该项目的210名糖尿病患者随机分为健康教育组(n=104)和自我管理组(n=106),在基线时和干预后的2个时间段开展问卷调查,比较两组生活质量指标得分、血压值、血糖值干预前后变化情况。结果9项指标里,健康教育组干预后3项指标(总体健康状况、工作和日常活动、空腹血糖值)较干预前显著改善(P<0.05),自我管理组干预后5项指标(总体健康状况、收缩压、舒张压、空腹血糖值、餐后血糖值)较干预前有改善(P<0.05);对两组的患者进行比较,健康教育组1项指标(工作和日常活动)得分有较大程度改善(P<0.05)。结论两种干预模式对糖尿病患者的病情控制都有积极的影响,且优势不同,患者自我管理的收缩压、舒张压、餐后血糖值三方面的改善效果较优。 Objective To explore the effects of different models of intervention on the quality of life,blood pressure and blood glucose in diabetic patients.Methods According to randomized controlled trial study design,210 diabetic patients in the community were randomly divided into health education group(n=104)and self-management group(n=106).At baseline and after the intervention,quality of life index score,results of blood pressure and blood glucose were collected by questionnaire survey and compared within the group and between groups.Results Among the 9 indicators,3 indicators(overall health status,work and daily activities,fasting blood glucose level)in the health education group were improved after intervention(P<0.05),and 5 indicators(overall health status,systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure,fasting blood glucose level,postprandial blood glucose level)in the self-management group were improved after intervention(P<0.05).Comparing the two groups of patients,the score of one index(work and daily activities)in the health education group was significantly improved(P<0.05).Conclusion The two intervention models have positive effects and different advantages on the disease control of diabetic patients.The patients in the self-management group have better improvement effects in systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure and postprandial blood glucose.
作者 戴冉 杨春 赵兴健 陈碧琼 郝晓萌 DAI Ran;YANG Chun;HAO Xiaomeng(Huangpu District Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Guangzhou,Gunangzhou,510530,China)
出处 《中国社会医学杂志》 2020年第5期525-529,共5页 Chinese Journal of Social Medicine
基金 广州市科技和信息化局科普计划项目(2014KP000081)。
关键词 糖尿病 效果评价 健康教育 自我管理 Diabetes Evaluation Health education Self-managemen
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

  • 1曾华.健康干预在糖尿病治疗中的影响[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(14):510-510. 被引量:5
  • 2张启新.糖尿病健康教育研究进展(综述)[J].继续医学教育,2012,26(3):59-62. 被引量:75
  • 3仲学锋,Edwin B.Fisher.糖尿病自我管理影响因素及健康教育干预研究进展[J].健康教育与健康促进,2010,5(2):133-138. 被引量:16
  • 4朱莉珍,吴克明,岑洲,丁永明,傅华,傅东波.社区糖尿病自我管理项目干预效果评价[J].上海预防医学,2005,17(10):506-506. 被引量:12
  • 5GANZ PA.Quality of life and the patient with cancer: individial and policy implications[J].Cancer (Supple),1994,74(4):1445-1452.
  • 6STEWART AL,HAYS RD,WARE JE.The MOS short-form general health survey: reliablity and validity in a patient population[J].Med Care,1988,26:724-735.
  • 7JACOBSON AM,SAMSON JA,GROUT MD,et al.The evaluation of two measures of quality of life in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes[J].Diabetes Care,1994,17:267-274.
  • 8WARE JE,SHEBOURNE CD.The MOS 36-item short from health survey (SF 36): 1.conceptual fromework and item selection[J].Med Care,1992,30:473-483.
  • 9STREINER DL,NORMAN GR.Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their develepment and use[M].Oxford.New York.Tokyo:Oxford University Press,1994:31-45.
  • 10GUYATT GT.Measuring disease specific quality of life in clinical trails[J].Can Med Assoc J,1986,134:889.

共引文献6985

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部